首页> 外文OA文献 >Do we all agree on our goals? A graduation research about the mediating effect of team identification on the relation between goal consensus and team performance
【2h】

Do we all agree on our goals? A graduation research about the mediating effect of team identification on the relation between goal consensus and team performance

机译:我们都同意我们的目标吗?团队认同对目标共识与团队绩效关系的中介作用的毕业研究

摘要

AbstractFor most organizations dealing with change, it means dealing with changing goals. New goals can provide a different organizational course which might influence the dynamics in teams. As a result, the structure of teams can change and this influences the inter-team dynamics. What is the result of this on the performance of the team? The relevance of this question is in normal economical conditions present, but in times of economic crises even more.This thesis is about team dynamics, researched in several different organizations where the focus is on goal consensus, team identification and team performance. The research question is: ‘how does team identification (partially) mediate the positive relation between goal consensus and team performance?’. Goal consensus is not measured directly like team identification and team performance, it is constructed from two components, goal understanding and goal commitment.A cross-sectional research is used to provide answers, with two different surveys (one for team members and one for team managers) collected personal and by mail in 59 teams. Because a mediating effect is researched, an additional macro in SPSS is used to calculate the effects. The effects are presented for team performance rated by team members and separately for team performance rated by team managers. Both theoretical and practical answers are given to the research question.Results show that goal understanding and goal commitment are correlated which each other. Together they provide a level of goal consensus which can be plotted to gain insight for both team members and managers. For team members’ rated team performance, results show that team identification partially mediates the positive relation between goal consensus and team performance. This means that the effect of goal consensus on team performance is reduced due to the intervene of team identification. For team managers’ rated team performance, a fully mediating effect has been found. This means that the effect of goal consensus on team performance disappears under influence of team identification. The influence of constituents is clearly present, which might be caused by introspection. The control variable team tenure is significantly and positively related to team identification. However, in both models, the influence of team tenure is very small.Although this research seems to give clear answers, the question about the effect size remains. There are strong indications that a larger effect size results in more power to the mediating effect which might cause different results. Another recommendation for further research is due to developments in the last decade: the development of virtual teams. These teams are not researched in this thesis but it is interesting to see if the results also comply in these teams, especially because these teams are not geographically in close proximity.Keywords:Thesis Do we all agree on our goals? J.G. Hofstee, 850998461
机译:摘要对于大多数应对变化的组织而言,这意味着应对变化的目标。新目标可以提供不同的组织过程,这可能会影响团队的动力。结果,团队的结构可能会发生变化,这会影响团队之间的动态。这对团队绩效有何影响?这个问题的相关性是在正常的经济条件下出现的,而在经济危机时期甚至更多。本文是关于团队动力的,在几个不同的组织中进行了研究,重点是目标共识,团队认同和团队绩效。研究问题是:“团队认同如何(部分)介导目标共识和团队绩效之间的积极关系?”。目标共识不是像团队识别和团队绩效那样直接衡量的,它由目标理解和目标承诺两个部分构成。横断面研究用于提供答案,有两个不同的调查(一个用于团队成员,一个用于团队成员)经理)以个人和邮件的形式收集了59个团队。因为研究了中介效应,所以在SPSS中使用了另一个宏来计算效应。效果是针对团队成员评估的团队绩效提出的,对于团队经理评估的团队绩效则是单独提出的。研究问题给出了理论上和实践上的答案。结果表明,目标理解与目标承诺是相互关联的。他们在一起提供了目标达成共识的程度,可以将其绘制出来以获取团队成员和经理的见解。对于团队成员评价的团队绩效,结果表明,团队认同在一定程度上介导了目标共识与团队绩效之间的正向关系。这意味着,由于团队识别的干预,降低了目标共识对团队绩效的影响。对于团队经理所评价的团队绩效,已经发现了一种完全中介作用。这意味着在团队认同的影响下,目标共识对团队绩效的影响将消失。很明显存在成分的影响,这可能是由内省引起的。控制变量团队的任期与团队识别显着正相关。但是,在这两个模型中,团队任职的影响都很小。尽管这项研究似乎给出了明确的答案,但关于影响大小的问题仍然存在。有充分的迹象表明,较大的效应大小会导致中介效应具有更大的力量,这可能会导致不同的结果。进一步研究的另一个建议是由于最近十年的发展:虚拟团队的发展。这些团队没有在本文中进行研究,但是有趣的是,看看这些团队的结果是否也符合要求,尤其是因为这些团队在地理位置上并不紧密。关键字:论文我们都同意我们的目标吗? J.G.霍夫斯提850998461

著录项

  • 作者

    Hofstee;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nl
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号