首页> 外文OA文献 >Requirements elicitation, which method in which situation?
【2h】

Requirements elicitation, which method in which situation?

机译:需求启发,在哪种情况下采用哪种方法?

摘要

Collection of requirements is also referenced as requirements elicitation. For requirements elicitation there are a number of different methods available. Which method is the most adequate method for requirements elicitation in a specific situation? The framework by Carrizo et al. (2014) has three steps to enable engineers to identify and classify a situation and find the most adequate elicitation method. Fifteen elicitation methods were studied within this framework. The insights and overview of the theoretical research on requirements elicitation is considered as the 'ideal state'. The empirical study that was executed in the second part of the research is considered as the 'actual state'. In the final part of the research, the 'ideal' and 'actual' states have been compared. The focus has been on differences, commonalities and steps that could be taken to improve the 'actual' state. Based on the comparison analysis between 'ideal' and 'actual state' it became clear that the most important difference is the lack of attention for elicitation selection in practice. Most of the time the selection of the elicitation method is based on experience.
机译:需求的收集也称为需求引发。对于需求引发,有许多不同的方法可用。在特定情况下,哪种方法最能满足需求? Carrizo等人的框架。 (2014年)采用三个步骤,使工程师能够识别和分类情况并找到最适当的启发方法。在此框架内研究了十五种激发方法。关于需求启发的理论研究的见解和概述被认为是“理想状态”。在研究的第二部分中执行的实证研究被视为“实际状态”。在研究的最后部分,比较了“理想”状态和“实际”状态。重点一直放在可以采取的改善“实际”状态的差异,共性和步骤上。通过对“理想状态”和“实际状态”之间的比较分析,可以清楚地看到,最重要的区别是在实践中缺乏对启发式选择的关注。大多数时候,启发方法的选择是基于经验的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Egas Roy;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号