首页> 外文OA文献 >Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all?
【2h】

Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all?

机译:对植物抗草食动物防御之间权衡的荟萃分析:植物是千篇一律的交易者,是一切的大师吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

On the basis of physiological and ecological costs of defense allocation, most plant defense theories predict the occurrence of trade-offs between resource investment in different types of antiherbivore defenses. To test this prediction, we conducted a meta-analysis of 31 studies published in 19762002 that provided data on covariation of different defensive traits in plant genotypes. We found no overall negative association between different defensive traits in plants; instead, the relationship between defensive traits varied from positive to negative depending on the types of co-occurring defenses. Evidence of trade-off was found only between constitutive and induced defenses. Therefore, to a large extent, plants appear to be jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all and may successfully produce several types of defense without paying considerable trade-offs. Our survey thus provides little evidence that genetic trade-offs between defensive traits significantly constrain the evolution of multiple defenses in plants.
机译:基于防御分配的生理和生态成本,大多数植物防御理论都预测了在不同类型的防草动物防御中资源投资之间的权衡取舍。为了检验这一预测,我们对19762002年发表的31项研究进行了荟萃分析,这些研究提供了植物基因型中不同防御性状的协变数据。我们发现植物的不同防御性状之间没有整体的消极联系。相反,防御性状之间的关系根据共存防御的类型而从正面变化为负面。仅在本构防御与诱导防御之间找到权衡的证据。因此,在很大程度上,植物似乎是万事通,是所有人的主人,并且可以成功地进行多种防御,而无需付出可观的折衷。因此,我们的调查几乎没有证据表明防御性状之间的遗传折衷显着限制了植物多重防御的进化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号