首页> 外文OA文献 >Reconsidering the accuracy of X-ray fluorescence and ion beam based methods when used to measure the thickness of ancient gildings
【2h】

Reconsidering the accuracy of X-ray fluorescence and ion beam based methods when used to measure the thickness of ancient gildings

机译:重新考虑X射线荧光法和基于离子束的方法在测量古代镀金厚度时的准确性

摘要

Since at least 5000 years ago, gilding techniques have been used for decoration purposes or to make artefacts appear as made of solid gold. Investigation of ancient gildings inevitably requires measuring their thickness, which is usually done either through the observation of cross-sections or by methods such as Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, particle-induced X-ray emission and X-ray fluorescence. Whereas the former method requires sampling, the latter ones are non-invasive and therefore preferable. These non-invasive methods, however, measure the number of atoms per unit area, which can be converted into thickness only if the density is known. So far this has not been considered a problem and, in most cases, density has been assumed as that of bulk gold. This paper aims at highlighting the real extent of the issue by comparing the results obtained by scanning electron microscopy and the above-mentioned non-destructive methods on a group of samples gilded by electroplating. As a result of this work, the density of the gold layers has been found to be three times lower than the theoretical density, presumably due to the presence of micro-porosity, which brings to underestimate the thickness by the same factor. Caution is therefore recommended when providing results on intrinsically porous gildings such as fire gilding and depletion gilding, where the presence of voids precludes a realistic estimation of density.
机译:自至少5000年前以来,镀金技术已用于装饰目的或使仿制品看起来像是由纯金制成的。对古代烫金的研究不可避免地需要测量其厚度,这通常通过观察横截面或通过卢瑟福背散射光谱法,颗粒诱导的X射线发射和X射线荧光等方法进行。前一种方法需要采样,而后一种方法是非侵入性的,因此是可取的。但是,这些非侵入性方法测量的是每单位面积的原子数,只有在已知密度的情况下才能将其转换为厚度。到目前为止,这还没有被认为是一个问题,并且在大多数情况下,密度被假定为散装金的密度。本文旨在通过比较扫描电子显微镜和上述非破坏性方法对一组镀金样品的结果,突出这一问题的真实范围。这项工作的结果是,发现金层的密度比理论密度低了三倍,这大概是由于存在微孔,导致以相同的系数低估了厚度。因此,建议在提供本征多孔镀金(例如火镀金和耗尽镀金)的结果时要小心,在这些情况下,如果存在空隙,则无法实际估算密度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号