首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two sequential separation methods for U and Th determination in environmental samples by alpha-particle spectrometry
【2h】

Comparison of two sequential separation methods for U and Th determination in environmental samples by alpha-particle spectrometry

机译:用α粒子光谱法测定环境样品中U和Th的两种顺序分离方法的比较

摘要

This paper deals with radiochemical procedures for U and Th determination ( 238U, 234U, 232Th and 230Th) via alpha spectrometry in water and sediment samples. After checking a separation process based on chromatographic extraction (using UTEVA resins), a detailed comparison with another separation process (liquid-liquid solvent extraction using tri-n-butyl phosphate-TBP) has been performed. Both separation processes were applied in environmental liquid and solid samples and the two separation methods were compared in order to find the more suitable separation process attending on parameters such as chemical yields, interference elimination, time-consuming, reagents used and generated wastes, among others. As major result, we can indicate the UTEVA separation process as a better option than TBP in U and Th isotopes determination by alphaparticle spectrometry. © by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München.
机译:本文介绍了通过α光谱法测定水和沉积物样品中U和Th的放射化学程序(238U,234U,232Th和230Th)。在检查了基于色谱萃取的分离工艺(使用UTEVA树脂)之后,与另一种分离工艺(使用磷酸三正丁酯-TBP进行液-液溶剂萃取)进行了详细的比较。两种分离方法均应用于环境液体和固体样品中,并比较了两种分离方法,以找到更合适的分离方法,这些方法涉及诸如化学收率,消除干扰,耗时,使用的试剂和产生的废物等参数。作为主要结果,在用α粒子光谱法测定U和Th同位素时,我们可以表明UTEVA分离过程比TBP更好。 ©Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag,慕尼黑。

著录项

  • 作者

    García-Tenorio R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号