首页> 外文OA文献 >Management-Related Traffic as a Stressor Eliciting Parental Care in a Roadside-Nesting Bird: The European Bee-Eater Merops apiaster
【2h】

Management-Related Traffic as a Stressor Eliciting Parental Care in a Roadside-Nesting Bird: The European Bee-Eater Merops apiaster

机译:与管理相关的交通作为路边嵌套鸟中父母育儿的压力源:欧洲养蜂食者梅洛普斯蜜蜂

摘要

Traffic is often acknowledged as a threat to biodiversity, but its effects have been mostlyudstudied on roads subjected to high traffic intensity. The impact of lower traffic intensity suchudas those affecting protected areas is generally neglected, but conservation-oriented activitiesudentailing motorized traffic could paradoxically transform suitable habitats into ecologicaludtraps. Here we questioned whether roadside-nesting bee-eaters Merops apiaster perceivedudlow traffic intensity as a stressor eliciting risk-avoidance behaviors (alarm calls and flockudflushes) and reducing parental care. Comparisons were established within DoñanaudNational Park (Spain), between birds exposed to either negligible traffic (ca. 0±10 vehiclesudper day) or low traffic intensity (ca. 10±90 vehicles per day) associated to management andudresearch activities. The frequencies of alarm calls and flock flushes were greater in areas ofudhigher traffic intensity, which resulted in direct mortality at moderate vehicle speeds ( 40udkm/h). Parental feeding rates paralleled changes in traffic intensity, but contrary to our predictions.udIndeed, feeding rates were highest in traffic-exposed nests, during working daysudand traffic rush-hours. Traffic-avoidance responses were systematic and likely involvedudcosts (energy expenditure and mortality), but vehicle transit positively influenced the reproductiveudperformance of bee-eaters through an increase of nestling feeding rates. Becauseudthe expected outcome of traffic on individual performance can be opposed when responsesudare monitored during mating (i.e. negative effect by increase of alarm calls and flockudflushes) or nestling-feeding period (i.e. at least short-term positive effect by increase of nestlingudfeeding rates), caution should be taken before inferring fitness consequences onlyudfrom isolated behaviors or specific life history stages.
机译:人们通常认为交通是对生物多样性的威胁,但对交通密度高的道路的影响大多得到了研究。通常忽略交通量较低的影响,例如影响保护区的交通影响,但是以保护为导向的活动使机动交通陷入困境可能反而将合适的栖息地转变为生态区。在这里,我们质疑路边筑巢的食蜂鸟梅洛普斯·阿皮斯特是否认为交通强度低是引发风险规避行为(报警和蜂拥而至)的压力源,并减少了父母的照料。在西班牙多纳那国家公园内建立了比较,以比较少的交通量(约0±10车/天)或交通强度低(约10±90车/天)的鸟类进行管理和研究活动。在交通强度较高的地区,报警电话和蜂群冲洗的频率更高,这导致在中等车速(40 udkm / h)下直接死亡。父母的进食速度与交通强度的变化相平行,但与我们的预测相反。 ud确实,在工作日 udand交通高峰期间,交通暴露的巢中的进食率最高。避免交通的反应是系统的,可能涉及成本(能量消耗和死亡率),但是车辆运输通过提高雏鸟的摄食率对食蜂鸟的生殖性能产生积极影响。因为如果在交配过程中监控响应(敢于增加警报电话和鸡群潮水的消极影响)或雏鸟喂养期(即至少通过增加对短期的积极影响),则可以反对交通对个人绩效的预期结果(nest育/哺乳率),仅在从孤立行为或特定生活史阶段推断适应后果之前应格外小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号