首页> 外文OA文献 >The philosophical significance of binary categories in Habermas’s discourse ethics
【2h】

The philosophical significance of binary categories in Habermas’s discourse ethics

机译:哈贝马斯话语伦理中二元范畴的哲学意义

摘要

The philosophical programme associated with the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas has been widely discussed in the literature. The fact that Habermas has devoted a considerable part of his work to the elaboration of this philosophical programme indicates that discourse ethics can be regarded as a cornerstone of his communication-theoretic approach to society. In essence, Habermas conceives of discourse ethics as a philosophical framework which derives the coordinative power of social normativity from the discursive power of communicative rationality. Although there is an extensive literature on Habermas’s communication-theoretic account of society, almost no attention has been paid to the fact that the theoretical framework which undergirds his discourse ethics is based on a number of binary conceptual divisions. It is the purpose of this paper to shed light on the philosophical significance of these binary categories in Habermas’s discourse ethics and thereby demonstrate that their complexity is indicative of the subject’s tension-laden immersion in social reality.
机译:与尤尔根·哈贝马斯(JürgenHabermas)话语伦理相关的哲学程序已在文献中被广泛讨论。哈贝马斯在其哲学著作中投入了相当多的工作,这一事实表明话语伦理学可以被视为他对社会进行传播理论研究的基础。本质上,哈贝马斯将话语伦理学视为一个哲学框架,该框架从交往理性的话语权中衍生出社会规范的协调力。尽管有大量关于哈贝马斯对社会的传播理论说明的文献,但几乎没有注意到这一事实,即支持他的话语伦理学的理论框架是基于许多二元概念性划分的。本文的目的是阐明哈贝马斯的话语伦理学中这些二元类别的哲学意义,从而证明它们的复杂性表明该主题沉浸在社会现实中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Susen Simon;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号