[[abstract]]本研究旨在建立自然人文生態景觀區遊憩承載量之推估模式，並以龜山島為實證研究對象。本研究所選取之遊憩承載量指標包括實質生態承載量、設施承載量和社會心理承載量等，並採取問卷與現場勘查為主要調查方式。研究結果發現以社會心理承載量而言，遊客認為瞬間之遊客承載量為127人時，屬於感覺適中程度；設施承載量實地估算為150人；在實質生態承載量推估部分，受訪者認為可容許之最大瞬間遊客密度即遊客承載量為174人。最後經由每日容許遊憩承載量分析，顯示週轉率較低，每日之容許遊憩承載量也較低，可減輕遊憩承載量增加之壓力，本研究結果係建立適合自然人文生態景觀區之遊憩承載量推估模式。The aim of this study was to establish a recreational carrying capacity estimated model for the natural and cultural ecological scenic area of Turtle Island, using Turtle Island itself as the subject of the study. Following a review of the literature, we selected ecological carrying capacity, facilities carrying capacity, and social carrying capacity as indicators for investigation and estimation. Data were collected primarily via questionnaires and on-site investigations. The results indicate that in terms of social carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that 127 persons is an appropriate amount. On-site estimation puts facilities carrying capacity at 150 persons. In the area of ecological carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that maximum carrying capacity is 174 persons. Daily recreational carrying capacity analysis indicates that decreasing the turnover of visitors' visitation can alleviate the pressure of increased carrying capacity. The results of the study show that an appropriate estimsted model for the carrying capacity of natural and cultural scenic areas should be established.
展开▼
机译：[[abstract]]本研究旨在建立自然人文生态景观区游憩承载量之推估模式，并以龟山岛为实证研究对象。本研究所选取之游憩承载量指标包括实质生态承载量、设施承载量和社会心理承载量等，并采取问卷与现场勘查为主要调查方式。研究结果发现以社会心理承载量而言，游客认为瞬间之游客承载量为127人时，属于感觉适中程度；设施承载量实地估算为150人；在实质生态承载量推估部分，受访者认为可容许之最大瞬间游客密度即游客承载量为174人。最后经由每日容许游憩承载量分析，显示周转率较低，每日之容许游憩承载量也较低，可减轻游憩承载量增加之压力，本研究结果系建立适合自然人文生态景观区之游憩承载量推估模式。 The aim of this study was to establish a recreational carrying capacity estimated model for the natural and cultural ecological scenic area of Turtle Island, using Turtle Island itself as the subject of the study. Following a review of the literature, we selected ecological carrying capacity, facilities carrying capacity, and social carrying capacity as indicators for investigation and estimation. Data were collected primarily via questionnaires and on-site investigations. The results indicate that in terms of social carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that 127 persons is an appropriate amount. On-site estimation puts facilities carrying capacity at 150 persons. In the area of ecological carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that maximum carrying capacity is 174 persons. Daily recreational carrying capacity analysis indicates that decreasing the turnover of visitors' visitation can alleviate the pressure of increased carrying capacity. The re sults of the study show that an appropriate estimsted model for the carrying capacity of natural and cultural scenic areas should be established.
展开▼
