首页> 外文OA文献 >Framing fracking: which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice?
【2h】

Framing fracking: which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice?

机译:框架压裂:英语规划,环境政策和实践中听到了哪些框架?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fracking in England has been the subject of significant controversy and has sparked not only public protest but also an associated framing war with differing social constructions of the technology adopted by different sides. This article explores the frames and counter-frames which have been employed by both the anti-fracking movement and by government and the oil and gas industry. It then considers the way in which the English planning and regulatory permitting systems have provided space for these frames within the relevant machinery for public participation. The article thus enables one to see which frames have been allowed a voice and which have been excluded.
机译:英格兰的压裂技术一直是一个备受争议的话题,不仅引发了公众抗议,而且引发了一场由不同方面采用的技术的不同社会结构引起的框架战争。本文探讨了抗压裂运动以及政府和石油天然气行业所采用的框架和反框架。然后,它考虑了英国的计划和监管许可系统在相关机制中为公众参与这些框架提供空间的方式。因此,该文章使人们能够看到哪些帧已被允许发出声音,哪些帧已被排除。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hilson Chris;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号