首页> 外文OA文献 >Supporting local diversity of habitats and species on farmland: a comparison of three wildlife-friendly schemes
【2h】

Supporting local diversity of habitats and species on farmland: a comparison of three wildlife-friendly schemes

机译:支持农田上栖息地和物种的本地多样性:三种野生动植物友好计划的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Restoration and maintenance of habitat diversity have been suggested as conservation priorities in farmed landscapes, but how this should be achieved and at what scale are unclear. This study makes a novel comparison of the effectiveness of three wildlife-friendly farming schemes for supporting local habitat diversity and species richness on 12 farms in England.udThe schemes were: (i) Conservation Grade (Conservation Grade: a prescriptive, non-organic, biodiversity-focused scheme), (ii) organic agriculture and (iii) a baseline of Entry Level Stewardship (Entry Level Stewardship: a flexible widespread government scheme).udConservation Grade farms supported a quarter higher habitat diversity at the 100-m radius scale compared to Entry Level Stewardship farms. Conservation Grade and organic farms both supported a fifth higher habitat diversity at the 250-m radius scale compared to Entry Level Stewardship farms. Habitat diversity at the 100-m and 250-m scales significantly predicted species richness of butterflies and plants. Habitat diversity at the 100-m scale also significantly predicted species richness of birds in winter and solitary bees. There were no significant relationships between habitat diversity and species richness for bumblebees or birds in summer.udButterfly species richness was significantly higher on organic farms (50% higher) and marginally higher on Conservation Grade farms (20% higher), compared with farms in Entry Level Stewardship. Organic farms supported significantly more plant species than Entry Level Stewardship farms (70% higher) but Conservation Grade farms did not (10% higher). There were no significant differences between the three schemes for species richness of bumblebees, solitary bees or birds.udPolicy implications. The wildlife-friendly farming schemes which included compulsory changes in management, Conservation Grade and organic, were more effective at increasing local habitat diversity and species richness compared with the less prescriptive Entry Level Stewardship scheme. We recommend that wildlife-friendly farming schemes should aim to enhance and maintain high local habitat diversity, through mechanisms such as option packages, where farmers are required to deliver a combination of several habitats.
机译:有人建议恢复和维持生境多样性是耕作景观中的保护重点,但目前尚不清楚如何实现这一目标以及达到何种规模。这项研究对三种野生生物友好型农业计划在支持英格兰12个农场的本地生境多样性和物种丰富性方面的有效性进行了新颖的比较。 ud这些计划是:(i)保护等级(保护等级:一种规范性的非有机方式) ,以生物多样性为重点的计划),(ii)有机农业和(iii)入门级管理的基线(入门级管理:灵活的广泛政府计划)。 ud保护级农场在100米半径内的栖息地多样性提高了四分之一与入门级管理农场相比。与入门级管理农场相比,保护级和有机农场在250米半径范围内均支持五分之一的栖息地多样性。 100 m和250 m尺度上的栖息地多样性显着预测了蝴蝶和植物的物种丰富度。 100 m尺度上的栖息地多样性也显着预测了冬季和单蜂的鸟类物种丰富度。夏季,大黄蜂或鸟类的栖息地多样性与物种丰富度之间没有显着关系。 ud与有机农场相比,有机农场的蝴蝶物种丰富度显着更高(提高了50%),在保护级农场中的蝴蝶物种丰富度略高(了20%)。入门级管理。有机农场比入门级管理农场支持的植物种类多得多(增加70%),而保护级农场则没有(增加10%)。大黄蜂,单蜂或鸟类的物种丰富度的三种方案之间没有显着差异。 ud政策含义。与规定较少的入门级管理计划相比,包括强制性管理变更,保护等级和有机体在内的对野生动植物友好的农业计划在增加当地栖息地多样性和物种丰富度方面更为有效。我们建议,对野生动植物友好的农业计划应旨在通过诸如选项包之类的机制来增强和维持当地较高的生境多样性,在该方案中,要求农民提供多种生境的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号