首页> 外文OA文献 >Bajo escasez ¿Media casa basta? Reflexiones sobre el Pritzker de Alejandro Aravena
【2h】

Bajo escasez ¿Media casa basta? Reflexiones sobre el Pritzker de Alejandro Aravena

机译:稀缺程度低一半房子够了吗?亚历杭德罗·阿拉维纳对普利兹克的思考

摘要

This article proposes a political agenda for a disciplinary trespassing against capitalist rule drawing upon the reasons that worthed a Pritzker award and the curative job in Venice Biennale for Alejandro Aravena. In both cases, the institutions argued that Aravena embodies a social architect with an agenda oriented to aid people living on scarcity. Along the article are revealed the ideological nature of these nominations and it exposes the necessity for emancipating architecture from the subjugation to profitability, capital accumulation, and power's reproduction. The subjugation to capital has destroyed the creative nature of the discipline, triggering a crisis whose release may be tackled through more theory, collective organization, and exploring new modes of production. The article claims for leaving the comfort zone for embracing the radicalism as a possible path toward disciplinary liberation.
机译:本文根据普里兹克奖和威尼斯双年展为亚历杭德罗·阿拉维纳(Alejandro Aravena)所做的有益工作,提出了反对资本主义统治的违纪行为的政治议程。在这两种情况下,这些机构都认为Aravena体现了一位社会建筑师的议程,该议程旨在帮助生活在短缺中的人们。沿着文章揭示了这些提名的意识形态本质,并揭示了从解放到盈利,资本积累和权力再生产的解放体系的必要性。对资本的屈从破坏了该学科的创造力,引发了一场危机,可以通过更多的理论,集体组织和探索新的生产方式来解决危机。这篇文章声称离开了拥抱激进主义的舒适区,这是走向纪律解放的可能途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号