首页> 外文OA文献 >Estudio comparativo de variables clínicas y costo de la técnica quirúrgica de histerectomía por vía abdominal y laparoscópica
【2h】

Estudio comparativo de variables clínicas y costo de la técnica quirúrgica de histerectomía por vía abdominal y laparoscópica

机译:腹部和腹腔镜子宫切除术的临床变量和费用的比较研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the present study is to compare clinical and economic outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy. The study design was retrospective and observational, and it was conducted on 1.663 patients aged between 27 and 83 undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions between 1997-2005, at the Hospital Clínico of the University of Chile.Of the 1.663 surgeries, 11,36% were laparoscopic hysterectomies and 88,63% accounted for abdominal hysterectomies. The global complication rate was 42,8%for abdominal hysterectomy and 16,4% for laparoscopic hysterectomy.Laparoscopic hysterectomy offers advantages such as a fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. However, its cost is significantly higher than that of the abdominal approach.
机译:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜与腹腔镜子宫切除术的临床和经济效果。研究设计是回顾性和观察性的,研究对象是1997-2005年在智利大学克利尼科医院进行的1.663例年龄在27至83岁之间,因良性妇科疾病而接受子宫切除术的患者.1.663例手术中,有11.36%腹腔镜子宫切除术占88.63%。腹腔镜子宫切除术的总并发症发生率为42.8%,腹腔镜子宫切除术的总并发症发生率为16.4%。与腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜子宫切除术具有以下优势:并发症更少,住院时间更短。但是,其成本明显高于腹部手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号