首页> 外文OA文献 >IS THERE JUSTICE FOR SEXUAL TRAUMA? A STRUCTURAL MODEL TO EXAMINE FACTORS INFLUENCING POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH AND DISTRESS
【2h】

IS THERE JUSTICE FOR SEXUAL TRAUMA? A STRUCTURAL MODEL TO EXAMINE FACTORS INFLUENCING POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH AND DISTRESS

机译:性创伤是否公正?影响创伤后生长和窘迫的检查因素的结构模型

摘要

The current study employed an exploratory approach to examine how specific sets of variables map onto a theoretical framework of posttraumatic growth (Schaefer u26 Moos, 1998). Specifically, the predictive capacity of belief in ultimate justice, optimism, and supportive relationships on outcomes of posttraumatic growth (PTG) and distress were examined, as mediated by supportive spirituality, meaning making, and problem solving. Secondarily, the factor structure and internal consistency of the English translation of the Belief in Immanent and Ultimate Justice Scale (BIUJS; Maes, 1998a, 1998b) was tested, which had yet to be used in the United States or with sexual assault survivors specifically. Archival data of 217 female survivors of sexual assault who completed an online survey as part of the author’s thesis were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The BIUJS, when applied specifically to sexual assault survivors, is best represented by a three-factor solution. The model hypothesized according to Schaefer and Moos’ (1998) theoretical framework was not supported by SEM results, and an alternate model emerged from analyses is presented to explain how worldview and appraisal/coping are related to posttraumatic growth and distress for sexual assault survivors. Survivors’ worldview (i.e., supportive spirituality, belief in ultimate justice, and belief in an immanently just world) indirectly predicted levels of PTG and distress. The relation between worldview and outcomes was significantly mediated by appraisal and coping (i.e., presence of meaning, optimism, supportive relationships, and problem solving). The current study adds to the literature and provides important directions for researchers and clinicians by demonstrating the important roles of worldview and appraisal/coping in facilitating growth, as well as the essential role of distress in healing.
机译:当前的研究采用探索性方法来研究特定变量集如何映射到创伤后生长的理论框架上(Schaefer u26 Moos,1998)。具体而言,考察了对最终正义,乐观和对创伤后成长(PTG)和痛苦的结局的支持关系的信念的预测能力,并通过支持灵性,含义制造和问题解决进行了调解。其次,测试了《内在和终极正义信念量表》(BIUJS; Maes,1998a,1998b)的英语翻译的要素结构和内部一致性,但尚未在美国或专门针对性侵犯幸存者使用。通过结构方程模型(SEM)分析了作为作者论文一部分完成在线调查的217名性侵犯女性幸存者的档案数据。 BIUJS特别适用于性侵犯幸存者时,最好用三因素解决方案来表示。 SEM的结果不支持根据Schaefer和Moos(1998)的理论框架假设的模型,并提出了一种从分析中得出的替代模型,以解释世界观和评估/应对与性侵犯幸存者的创伤后生长和痛苦如何相关。幸存者的世界观(即,支持精神,对终极正义的信念以及对内在公正世界的信念)间接预测了PTG和苦难的程度。评估和应对(即存在意义,乐观,支持性关系和解决问题)在很大程度上介导了世界观与成果之间的关系。当前的研究通过展示世界观和评估/应对在促进生长中的重要作用以及窘迫在康复中的重要作用,为文献和临床研究提供了重要指导。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fetty Danielle Grace;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号