首页> 外文OA文献 >Google Books Rejected: Taking the Orphans to the Digital Library of Alexandria
【2h】

Google Books Rejected: Taking the Orphans to the Digital Library of Alexandria

机译:Google图书遭拒:将孤儿带到亚历山大数字图书馆

摘要

The idea of the Library of Alexandria has powerfully expanded over the centuries, embodying the dream of universal wisdom and knowledge centralized in one single place. Digitization projects, such as the Google books project, are reviving the hope that this dream may come true. Moreover, the ubiquity of the networked environment promises to open access to this aiber-library to everybody with an Internet connection. Today the entire collection of human knowledgemay be only one click away.Whether the dream of the Library of Alexandria will be achieved by the Google books project is highly debated. Recently, a court decision concluded that perhaps that dream is not within Google's reach at the moment.In this paper, I will review the Google books project as both an opportunity to discuss the orphan works problem and to examine the copyright strictures impinging on digitization projects. In looking at the Google books litigation, I will investigate the sustainability of Google's fair use defense before delving into the description of the Google books settlement. I will then discuss the recent opinion from the Southern District of New York rejecting the settlement in its present form. I will argue that the Google books settlement is an additional move towards propertization and privatization of culture, although the settlement furthers the public interest as well. In warning against this privatization, I will argue that we need a global effort towards the creation of a World Digital Public Library.
机译:几个世纪以来,亚历山大图书馆的思想已经有力地扩展了,体现了将普遍智慧和知识集中在一个地方的梦想。诸如Google图书项目之类的数字化项目正在重燃希望实现这一梦想的希望。此外,网络环境的普遍性有望使每个具有Internet连接的人都可以访问该aiber库。如今,整个人类知识收藏集仅需单击一下即可。Google图书项目是否会实现亚历山大图书馆的梦想,这是充满争议的。最近,法院的一项裁决得出结论,也许梦dream以求目前不在谷歌的范围之内。在本文中,我将对谷歌图书项目进行回顾,这既有机会讨论孤儿作品问题,也有机会研究影响数字化项目的版权限制。在研究Google图书诉讼时,我将研究Google合理使用辩护的可持续性,然后再详细介绍Google图书和解的内容。然后,我将讨论纽约南区最近拒绝目前形式的解决方案的意见。我将争辩说,尽管和解协议也促进了公众利益,但Google的和解协议是向文化的私有化和私有化迈出的又一步。为了防止这种私有化,我将指出,我们需要在全球范围内努力创建世界数字公共图书馆。

著录项

  • 作者

    Frosio Giancarlo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号