首页> 外文OA文献 >Access to Marriage and Reproduction among Migrants in Antwerp and Stockholm. A Longitudinal Approach to Processes of Social Inclusion and Exclusion, 1846-1926
【2h】

Access to Marriage and Reproduction among Migrants in Antwerp and Stockholm. A Longitudinal Approach to Processes of Social Inclusion and Exclusion, 1846-1926

机译:安特卫普和斯德哥尔摩移民的婚姻和生殖途径。 1846-1926年,社会融合和排斥过程的纵向方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A longitudinal approach is used to describe and explain processes of social inclusion and exclusion among different groups of migrants in Antwerp and Stockholm (1846-1926), in terms of access to marriage and reproduction. In this way we want to get a better idea about the factors which facilitated or hampered the social inclusion of migrants upon arrival in two different Western European port cities. The results of the discrete time event history analyses show that social inclusion of migrants was easier in Antwerp and became easier over time, while in Stockholm it was more difficult and became even more complicated over time. This finding might be interpreted as the result of greater societal openness in Antwerp, as the Belgian port-city’s economic success depended largely upon foreigners and international trade. Higher odds for social inclusion in Antwerp might also have been related to differences in the chances of finding an urban niche, which in turn might have been a result of disparities in economic and demographic growth. Most likely it was a combination of differences in the local opportunity structure and the level of societal openness. Furthermore, it was found that region and place of birth, age at arrival, historical time period, and, in the case of Stockholm, gender and social class had an important impact on the chances of successful inclusion.
机译:纵向方法用于描述和解释安特卫普和斯德哥尔摩(1846-1926年)不同移民群体之间的社会融合和排斥过程,涉及获得婚姻和生育的机会。通过这种方式,我们希望更好地了解在到达两个不同的西欧港口城市时促进或阻碍移民的社会融合的因素。离散时间事件历史分析的结果表明,随着时间的流逝,移民的社会融合在安特卫普变得更加容易,并且随着时间的推移变得更加容易,而在斯德哥尔摩,随着时间的推移,移民的社会融合更加困难并且变得更加复杂。这一发现可能被解释为安特卫普社会开放程度更高的结果,因为比利时港口城市的经济成功在很大程度上取决于外国人和国际贸易。安特卫普的社会包容性更高的可能性也可能与寻找城市利基机会的差异有关,而这又可能是经济和人口增长差异造成的。这很可能是当地机会结构和社会开放程度差异的结合。此外,还发现出生地和出生地,到达的年龄,历史时期,以及在斯德哥尔摩,性别和社会阶层对成功融入社会的机会具有重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号