首页> 外文OA文献 >Study for a method to assess the ease of disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment. Method development and application to a flat panel display case study
【2h】

Study for a method to assess the ease of disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment. Method development and application to a flat panel display case study

机译:研究一种评估电气和电子设备拆卸简便性的方法。方法开发和在平板显示器案例研究中的应用

摘要

This report has been developed within the project “Technical support for Environmental Footprinting, material efficiency in product policy and the European Platform on LCA” (2013-2016) funded by Directorate General Environment, and focused on the development of a standardisable method with a verifiable metric to assess the reversible disassembly of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). The main motivation of this study was the need for a robust method to evaluate the ability to access or remove certain components from products to facilitate their repair, reuse or recycling. Such a method is developed to serve different purposes, such as product design optimization, compliance to policies and end-of-life treatment improvement. Such a work is particularly relevant to the 2015 Circular Economy action plan that will “promote reparability, upgradability, durability and recyclability of products” through Ecodesign Directive and to the mandate addressed to European standardisation organisations in 2015 to develop standards on material efficiency of energy related products (ErP). The report provides a scientific background, with the review of current methods available in the literature, which were grouped into: 1) methods to categorise manual operations and disassembly actions and 2) methods to calculate the ease of disassembly of products. Based on the presented literature review, the proposed method focused on the identification of relevant product parameters and disassembly actions to be used for the calculation of a disassembly index. In particular, the authors have identified six basic and relevant disassembly actions of an average disassembly process: 1) Tool change, 2) Identifying connectors, 3) Manipulation of the product, 4) Positioning, 5) Disconnection and 6) Removing. For each of them, and for each type of fastener, a table of reference values was determined. Successively, an innovative disassembly index has been proposed and named as “ease of Disassembly Metric” (eDiM). Given a product and the sequence of actions to disassemble it, the eDiM calculation consists of associating a value of the reference table to each of these actions. The summation of these values finally results in the eDiM for the considered product and disassembly sequence. The eDiM index assesses the effort needed to completely or partially disassemble a product. The index is also representing an estimation of the time necessary for the disassembly and therefore it is expressed in standards unit of measurement for time (seconds). The eDiM index was tested on a 14” flat panel monitor (LCD), a small electronic device with a weight of 2.6 kg that can be disassembled on a workbench. The eDiM was calculated for the complete disassembly and also for the selective extraction of certain components, as the Printed Wiring Boards. The calculated values were also compared to the disassembly performed by a professional operator, in order to measure the possible deviations. Considering the complete disassembly, the comparison between calculated eDiM and measured values resulted in a limited difference (the calculated eDiM was 8.5% higher than the measured value), with the largest deviation observed for the disassembly action of “Identifying connectors”. Based on the results of the present analysis, the authors positively concluded on the feasibility to develop a robust and potentially standardisable method to assess the ease of disassembly of EEE. The method is based on information about the product composition and fastening that can be directly verified on the product. Authors also concluded that the proposed method is suitable to support product design for disassembly and policies for ecodesign.
机译:本报告是在由总环境局资助的“环境足迹的技术支持,产品政策中的材料效率和欧洲LCA平台”(2013-2016)项目中制定的,重点是开发可验证的标准化方法评估电气和电子设备可逆拆卸(EEE)的指标。这项研究的主要动机是需要一种可靠的方法来评估从产品中访问或移除某些组件的能力,以促进其维修,重复使用或回收。开发这种方法是为了满足不同的目的,例如产品设计优化,对政策的遵从性和寿命终止治疗的改进。这项工作与2015年《循环经济》行动计划特别相关,该计划将通过《生态设计指令》“促进产品的可修复性,可升级性,耐用性和可回收性”以及2015年对欧洲标准化组织的授权,以制定与能源相关的材料效率标准产品(ErP)。该报告提供了科学背景,并回顾了文献中提供的当前方法,这些方法分为:1)将手动操作和拆卸操作分类的方法,以及2)计算产品拆卸简便性的方法。在提出的文献综述的基础上,提出的方法侧重于相关产品参数的识别和要用于拆卸指数计算的拆卸动作。特别是,作者确定了平均拆卸过程中的六个基本和相关的拆卸动作:1)更换工具,2)识别连接器,3)产品操作,4)定位,5)断开和6)拆卸。对于它们中的每一种以及每种类型的紧固件,确定了参考值表。继而,提出了一种创新的拆卸索引,并将其命名为“拆卸简便性指标”(eDiM)。给定一个产品和拆卸该产品的动作顺序,eDiM计算包括将参考表的值与每个这些动作相关联。这些值的总和最终得出所考虑产品和拆卸顺序的eDiM。 eDiM指数评估了完全或部分拆卸产品所需的工作。该指数还代表拆卸所需时间的估计,因此,它以标准计量单位表示时间(秒)。 eDiM指数在14英寸平板显示器(LCD)上进行了测试,该显示器是重量为2.6 kg的小型电子设备,可以在工作台上拆卸。计算eDiM的目的是完全拆卸,也可以选择性地提取某些组件,例如印刷线路板。为了测量可能的偏差,还将计算值与专业操作员进行的拆卸进行比较。考虑到完全拆卸,计算出的eDiM与测量值之间的比较导致了有限的差异(计算出的eDiM比测量值高出8.5%),其中“识别连接器”的拆卸作用观察到最大偏差。基于当前分析的结果,作者对开发一种健壮且可能标准化的方法来评估EEE拆卸简便性的可行性得出了肯定的结论。该方法基于可直接在产品上验证的有关产品组成和紧固的信息。作者还得出结论,提出的方法适用于支持拆卸产品设计和生态设计政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号