首页> 外文OA文献 >Minimizing the levelized cost of electricity production from low-temperature geothermal heat sources with ORCs: water or air cooled?
【2h】

Minimizing the levelized cost of electricity production from low-temperature geothermal heat sources with ORCs: water or air cooled?

机译:使用ORC将低温地热热源的平均发电成本降至最低:水还是风冷?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A system optimization of ORCs cooled by air-cooled condensers or wet cooling towers and powered by low-temperature geothermal heat sources is performed in this paper. The configuration of the ORC is optimized together with the geometry of all the components. The objective is to minimize the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the performance of ORCs with different types of cooling systems are compared to each other. The results show that it is economically more interesting to use mechanical-draft wet cooling towers instead of air-cooled condensers. The difference in performance is especially large for a low brine-inlet temperature. The investment cost of wet cooling towers is much lower than the one of air-cooled condensers, so the discount rate has less influence on the former type of cooling. The effect of the water price and the climate conditions on the economics of ORCs is also investigated. Both the brine-inlet temperature and the dry-bulb temperature of the surroundings have a strong influence and values of the optimized LCOE between about 55 and 185€/MWh are obtained.
机译:本文对由空冷式冷凝器或湿式冷却塔冷却并由低温地热热源驱动的ORC进行了系统优化。 ORC的配置与所有组件的几何形状一起进行了优化。目的是最大程度地降低电力平均成本(LCOE),并将具有不同类型冷却系统的ORC的性能进行比较。结果表明,使用机械起草的湿式冷却塔代替气冷式冷凝器在经济上更加有趣。对于低盐水入口温度,性能差异特别大。湿式冷却塔的投资成本远低于风冷式冷凝器,因此折现率对前一种冷却方式的影响较小。还研究了水价和气候条件对ORC经济学的影响。周围环境的盐水入口温度和干球温度都具有很强的影响力,优化的LCOE值约为55至185€/ MWh。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号