首页> 外文OA文献 >Benedictine thought as a catalyst for 20st Century liturgical space. The motivations behind Dom Hans van der Laan’s ascetic church architecture
【2h】

Benedictine thought as a catalyst for 20st Century liturgical space. The motivations behind Dom Hans van der Laan’s ascetic church architecture

机译:本笃会认为是20世纪礼仪空间的催化剂。唐·汉斯·范德兰苦修教堂建筑的动机

摘要

Already in his first classes on church architecture just before WWII, the Benedictine monk-architect Dom Hans van der Laan (1904-1991) condemned liturgical meaning through symbolism. Long before the Second Vatican Council, he made several plans to alter churches in order to enhance the celebration, stripping them from all ornamentation. Especially in those early days, Dom van der Laan’s position was quiet subversive and his approach repeatedly questioned by his peers.In contrast with the ongoing modernist and traditionalist tendencies followed by his contemporaries, Dom van der Laan developed an architectural language that was strongly driven by his Benedicine motivations. To find directions for the conception of liturgical space, he thoroughly studied the writings of Dom Guéranger and Dom Delatte and their commentaries on the old church fathers. In the 1960’s he rediscovered the writings of Maurice Blondel (1861-1949), giving a new dimension to his two manifestos De Architectonische Ruimte (Architectonic Space, 1977) and Vormenspel der Liturgie (Play of Forms 1985).Most publications on the work of Dom Hans van deer Laan focus only on his architectural work, or on his liturgical background. Nevertheless, it is only by analysing them as an intertwined entity that his work can be fully understood. This paper traces his quest for liturgical foundations, illustrating how they gave rise to a general theory of Architectonic Space. The research is based on primary source material, unpublished letters and communication, design sketches and lectures. Hereby, underlying motives and interconnections between Van der Laan’s Benedictine background and architectural theory can be revealed.In this sense, the work of Dom Hans van der Laan and his quest offer new insights towards an intense interaction between liturgy and architecture.
机译:本笃会修道士建筑师唐·汉斯·范德兰(Dom Hans van der Laan,1904-1991年)在二战前的第一堂教堂建筑课程中就已经通过象征主义谴责了礼仪意义。在梵蒂冈第二次理事会召开很久之前,他就制定了几项计划来改变教堂,以增强庆祝活动,使它们脱离所有装饰。尤其是在早期,Dom van der Laan的立场是颠覆性的,他的方法屡次遭到同行的质疑。与之同时代的现代主义和传统主义趋势相反,Dom van der Laan提出了一种建筑语言,受到了他的本笃会动机。为了找到礼仪空间概念的方向,他彻底研究了唐·格朗格和唐·德拉特的著作以及他们对旧教会父亲的评论。在1960年代,他重新发现了莫里斯·金发女郎(Maurice Blondel,1861-1949)的著作,为他的两个宣言《建筑师》(De Architectonische Ruimte)(建筑空间,1977年)和《弗门斯贝尔·德·里图吉》(Vormenspel der Liturgie)(1985年的《形式玩法》)赋予了新的维度。 Dom Hans van deer Laan只关注他的建筑作品或他的礼仪背景。然而,只有通过将它们作为一个相互交织的实体进行分析,才能充分理解他的作品。本文追溯了他对礼仪基础的追求,阐明了它们如何产生了建筑空间学的一般理论。该研究基于主要的原始资料,未发表的信函和交流,设计草图和讲座。因此,可以揭示范德兰本笃会背景与建筑理论之间的内在动机和相互联系。从这个意义上讲,唐·汉斯·范德兰的作品及其追求为礼仪与建筑之间的紧密互动提供了新的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号