首页> 外文OA文献 >Effectiveness of Selected Soil Conservation Practices on Soil Erosion Control and Crop Yields in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania
【2h】

Effectiveness of Selected Soil Conservation Practices on Soil Erosion Control and Crop Yields in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania

机译:坦桑尼亚Usambara山区精选土壤保护措施对土壤侵蚀控制和作物产量的有效性

摘要

Indigenous soil conservation measures such as miraba have been widely used in Usambara Mountains for controlling soil erosion but with little success. On-farm runoff experiments were set from 2011–2014 on Acrisols in Majulai and Migambo villages with contrasting agro-ecological conditions in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of miraba and miraba with various mulching materials in reducing runoff, soil and nutrient losses and improving productivity of maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Results show that mean annual runoff coefficients (mm mm-1) ranged from 0.72 for cropland with no soil conservation measure (control) to 0.15 for cropland with miraba and Tithonia (Tithonia diversifolia) mulching in Majulai village and respectively from 0.68 to 0.13 in Migambo village. Soil loss was significantly (P= .05) higher under control than under miraba with either Tughutu (Vernonia myriantha) or Tithonia mulching e. g. 184 vs. 20 in Majulai and 124 vs. 8 Mg ha-1 year-1 in Migambo village in 2012. The Pfactors were significantly (P = .05) higher under miraba sole than under miraba with mulching inMajulai village (0.18 vs. 0.11) and in Migambo village (0.10 vs. 0.05).The annual nutrient losses in kg ha-1yr-1 were significantly (P = .05) higher under control than under miraba with mulching 367 vs. 37 total N, 0.8 vs. 0.1 P and 14 vs. 4 K for Majulai village; 474 vs. 26 total N, 0.7 vs. 0.1 P and 20 vs. 1.2 K for Migambo village in 2012. Maize and bean yields were significantly (P = .05) higherunder miraba with Tughutu mulching than under control (e.g. 2.0 vs. 0.7 Mg ha-1 for maize in Majulai in 2012). Thus miraba with Tughutu mulching is more effective in improving crop yields than miraba with Tithonia and miraba sole.
机译:诸如miraba之类的土著水土保持措施已在Usambara山区广泛用于控制土壤侵蚀,但收效甚微。在2011年至2014年间,对Majulai和Migambo村庄的Acrisols进行了农场径流试验,对比了坦桑尼亚Usambara山区的农业生态条件。目的是研究miraba和miraba与各种覆盖材料在减少径流,土壤和养分流失以及提高玉米(Zea mays)和菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris)的有效性。结果表明,年均径流系数(mm mm-1)介于不采取水土保持措施(对照)的农田中为0.72,而在马朱莱村覆盖有miraba和Tithonia(Tithonia diversifolia)的农田为0.15,在Migambo中则为0.68至0.13。村。与Tughutu(Vernonia myriantha)或Tithonia地膜覆盖的miraba相比,在控制下的水土流失显着(P = .05)高。 G。 2012年,Migambo村的Majulai分别是184 vs. 20和Mg ha-1 Year-1的124 vs. 8 Mg ha-1 year-1。在miraba鞋底下,Pfactor显着(P = .05)比在miraba下覆盖了Majulai村(0.18 vs. 0.11) )和Migambo村(0.10 vs.0.05)。在控制下,kg ha-1yr-1的年养分损失比miraba显着高(P = .05),覆盖367 vs.37总氮,0.8 vs.0.1 Majulai村的P和14 vs. 4 K; 2012年,米甘布村的总氮分别为474和26,总氮分别为0.7和0.1 P,以及20和1.2K。相对于对照,米拉巴玉米和豆类单产显着(P = .05)高于对照(例如2.0 vs. 0.7)。 2012年Majulai的玉米Mg ha-1)。因此,覆盖有Tughutu的miraba比带有Tithonia和miraba sole的miraba在提高作物产量方面更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号