首页> 外文OA文献 >Quality management techniques in public sector organizations: the role of managerial autonomy and organizational culture
【2h】

Quality management techniques in public sector organizations: the role of managerial autonomy and organizational culture

机译:公共部门组织中的质量管理技术:管理自治和组织文化的作用

摘要

According to NPM, more effective and efficient public services can be delivered if public sector organizations are granted more managerial autonomy and if they use various (private sector) management techniques. To date, only very limited attention has been paid to the link between managerial autonomy and the use of management techniques. With this study, we seek to fill this gap in the extensive NPM literature by examining the extent to which managerial autonomy has an effect on the use of management techniques, thereby focusing on quality management techniques. In general, we try to shed light on the determinants of the use of quality management techniques. Therefore, besides managerial autonomy we also look at other factors that might affect the use of quality management techniques e.g. result control, legal statute, organizational size, organizational culture. The results of two surveys – being conducted in 124 Flemish public sector organizations – indicated that managerial autonomy is positively related to the use of quality management techniques: the higher the level of managerial autonomy, the larger the extent to which quality management techniques are used. Also result control is positively associated with the use of quality management techniques. No significant differences were found in the extent to which quality management techniques were used among small and large organizations. The relationship between managerial autonomy, result control and the use of quality management techniques was not as clear-cut as expected: the organization’s legal statute and some organizational cultural aspects (emphasis on innovation, valuing customers) act as mediators in this relationship. Overall, the results of this study imply that one should be careful in stating that managerial autonomy, result control directly lead to a better service delivery (by e.g. using quality management techniques) as other factors seem to intervene in the autonomy – performance link.
机译:据NPM称,如果赋予公共部门组织更多的管理自主权,并且使用各种(私营部门)管理技术,则可以提供更有效和高效的公共服务。迄今为止,只对管理自主权与使用管理技术之间的联系给予了非常有限的关注。通过这项研究,我们试图通过检查管理自主性对管理技术使用的影响程度,从而着重于质量管理技术,来填补NPM文献中的空白。总的来说,我们试图阐明使用质量管理技术的决定因素。因此,除了管理自主权外,我们还会研究其他可能影响质量管理技术使用的因素,例如:结果控制,法律法规,组织规模,组织文化。在124个佛兰芒公共部门组织中进行的两项调查结果表明,管理自主性与质量管理技术的使用正相关:管理自主性水平越高,质量管理技术的使用程度就越大。结果控制也与质量管理技术的使用成正相关。在大小组织之间使用质量管理技术的程度没有发现显着差异。管理自主权,结果控制和质量管理技术的使用之间的关系并没有预期的那么明确:组织的法律法规和组织的某些文化方面(强调创新,重视客户)在这种关系中起中介作用。总的来说,这项研究的结果暗示着应该谨慎地指出,管理自主性,结果控制直接导致更好的服务交付(例如通过使用质量管理技术),因为其他因素似乎会干预自主性-绩效联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号