首页> 外文OA文献 >Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English
【2h】

Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English

机译:中古和早期现代英语中名词和言语动名词发展的功能动机

摘要

This paper examines the use of three gerund constructions in Middle and Early Modern English on the basis of corpus data covering the period 1250–1640. The constructions examined are verbal gerunds (eating the apple), bare nominal gerunds (eating of the ap-ple) and definite nominal gerunds (the eating of the apple). It is argued that the success of verbal gerunds in the history of English can only be understood against the back-ground of the interaction with their nominal counterparts. An analysis is offered of how the system of gerund constructions is functionally organised, comparing discourse-functional behaviour, distribution and internal syntax across the three gerund types. It is shown that verbal gerunds closely resemble bare nominal gerunds in terms of discourse-functional behaviour and distribution, but are syntactically more flexible. As a result, verbal gerunds could replace bare nominal gerunds, copying their function but adding syntactic flexibility. By contrast, definite nominal gerunds, being functionally distinct from the other two types, developed a number of specialised uses, which ensured their survival. These conclusions throw light on issues of functional motivation in the devel-opment of the English gerund. Historical change is seen to be grounded in synchronic functional organisation. At the same time, it is shown that the only existing explanation for the rise of verbal gerunds (attributing their success to their ability to combine with prepositions) can only be partly correct.
机译:本文根据涵盖1250至1640年期间的语料数据,研究了中古现代英语中三种gerund构造的用法。考察的结构是口头动词(吃苹果),裸露的名义动词(吃苹果)和确定的名义动词(吃苹果)。有人认为,只有在与名义上的对等互动的背景下才能理解口语动名词在英语史上的成功。分析了三种动名词类型的话语功能行为,分布和内部语法,对动名词构造系统的功能组织方式进行了分析。研究表明,言语动名词在语篇功能行为和分布方面与裸露的名义动名词极为相似,但在句法上更为灵活。结果,口头动名词可以代替裸露的名词动名词,复制其功能,但增加语法灵活性。相比之下,功能上不同于其他两种类型的确定的名义动名词发展了许多专门用途,从而确保了它们的生存。这些结论阐明了英语动名词发展中的功能动机问题。历史变化被认为是建立在同步功能组织的基础上的。同时,这表明,关于言语动名词上升的唯一现有解释(将其成功归功于与介词结合的能力)只能部分正确。

著录项

  • 作者

    De Smet Hendrik;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号