首页> 外文OA文献 >Instance-level accuracy versus bag-level accuracy in multi-instance learning
【2h】

Instance-level accuracy versus bag-level accuracy in multi-instance learning

机译:多实例学习中的实例级准确度与包级准确度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In multi-instance learning, instances are organized into bags, anda bag is labeled positive if it contains at least one positive instance, and neg-ative otherwise; the labels of the individual instances are not given. The taskis to learn a classifier from this limited information. While the original taskdescription involved learning an instance classifier, in the literature the taskis often interpreted as learning a bag classifier. Depending on which of thesetwo interpretations is used, it is more natural to evaluate classifiers accordingto how well they predict, respectively, instance labels or bag labels. In theliterature, however, the two interpretations are often mixed, or the intendedinterpretation is left implicit. In this paper, we investigate the difference be-tween bag-level and instance-level accuracy, both analytically and empirically.We show that there is a substantial difference between these two, and bet-ter performance on one does not necessarily imply better performance on theother. It is therefore useful to clearly distinguish them, and always use theevaluation criterion most relevant for the task at hand.
机译:在多实例学习中,实例被组织成包,如果包中包含至少一个肯定实例,则将其标记为肯定,否则为否定。没有给出各个实例的标签。任务是从此有限的信息中学习分类器。尽管最初的任务描述涉及学习实例分类器,但是在文献中,该任务通常被解释为学习袋分类器。根据使用这两种解释中的哪一种,更自然地根据分类器对实例标签或袋标签的预测程度来评估分类器。但是,在文学中,这两种解释常常是混合的,或者预期的解释是含蓄的。在本文中,我们通过分析和经验研究了袋级和实例级精度之间的差异,我们表明这两者之间存在实质性差异,更好的性能不一定意味着性能更好在另一。因此,清楚地区分它们并始终使用与手头任务最相关的评估标准非常有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号