首页> 外文OA文献 >Organic vs. Conventional Grassland Management: Do N-15 and C-13 Isotopic Signatures of Hay and Soil Samples Differ?
【2h】

Organic vs. Conventional Grassland Management: Do N-15 and C-13 Isotopic Signatures of Hay and Soil Samples Differ?

机译:有机草原和常规草原的管理:干草和土壤样品的N-15和C-13同位素特征是否不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Distinguishing organic and conventional products is a major issue of food security and authenticity. Previous studies successfully used stable isotopes to separate organic and conventional products, but up to now, this approach was not tested for organic grassland hay and soil. Moreover, isotopic abundances could be a powerful tool to elucidate differences in ecosystem functioning and driving mechanisms of element cycling in organic and conventional management systems. Here, we studied the delta N-15 and delta C-13 isotopic composition of soil and hay samples of 21 organic and 34 conventional grasslands in two German regions. We also used Delta delta N-15 (delta N-15 plant - delta N-15 soil) to characterize nitrogen dynamics. In order to detect temporal trends, isotopic abundances in organic grasslands were related to the time since certification. Furthermore, discriminant analysis was used to test whether the respective management type can be deduced from observed isotopic abundances. Isotopic analyses revealed no significant differences in delta C-13 in hay and delta C-13 in both soil and hay between management types, but showed that delta C-13 abundances were significantly lower in soil of organic compared to conventional grasslands. delta C-15 values implied that management types did not substantially differ in nitrogen cycling. Only delta C-13 in soil and hay showed significant negative relationships with the time since certification. Thus, our result suggest that organic grasslands suffered less from drought stress compared to conventional grasslands most likely due to a benefit of higher plant species richness, as previously shown by manipulative biodiversity experiments. Finally, it was possible to correctly classify about two third of the samples according to their management using isotopic abundances in soil and hay. However, as more than half of the organic samples were incorrectly classified, we infer that more research is needed to improve this approach before it can be efficiently used in practice.
机译:区分有机和常规产品是食品安全和真实性的主要问题。先前的研究成功地使用了稳定的同位素来分离有机和常规产品,但是直到现在,这种方法还没有针对有机草地的干草和土壤进行过测试。此外,同位素丰度可能是阐明有机和常规管理系统中生态系统功能和元素循环的驱动机制差异的有力工具。在这里,我们研究了德国两个地区21个有机草原和34个常规草原的土壤和干草样品的δN-15和δC-13同位素组成。我们还使用了Delta N-15三角洲(N-15三角洲植物-N-15三角洲土壤)来表征氮的动力学。为了检测时间趋势,有机草原中的同位素丰度与自认证以来的时间相关。此外,判别分析用于测试是否可以从观察到的同位素丰度中推导出相应的管理类型。同位素分析显示,不同管理类型之间的干草中的C-13增量和土壤和干草中的C-13差异均无显着性,但与常规草地相比,有机土壤中C-13的丰度显着降低。 δC-15值暗示管理类型在氮循环中没有实质性差异。自认证以来,仅土壤和干草中的δC-13与时间呈显着负相关。因此,我们的结果表明,与传统草原相比,有机草原遭受干旱胁迫的可能性较小,这是由于较高的植物物种丰富度所带来的好处,如先前通过操纵性生物多样性实验所显示的。最后,有可能使用土壤和干草中的同位素丰度,根据样本的管理正确分类约三分之二的样本。但是,由于一半以上的有机样品分类不正确,我们推断需要更多的研究来改进这种方法,然后才能在实践中有效地使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号