首页> 外文OA文献 >Tropopause level Rossby wave breaking in the Northern Hemisphere: a feature-based validation of the ECHAM5-HAM climate model
【2h】

Tropopause level Rossby wave breaking in the Northern Hemisphere: a feature-based validation of the ECHAM5-HAM climate model

机译:北半球对流层级Rossby波浪破碎:ECHAM5-HAM气候模型的基于特征的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Breaking synoptic-scale Rossby waves (RWB) at the tropopause level are central to the daily weather evolution in the extratropics and the subtropics. RWB leads to pronounced meridional transport of heat, moisture, momentum, and chemical constituents. RWB events are manifest as elongated and narrow structures in the tropopause-level potential vorticity (PV) field. A feature-based validation approach is used to assess the representation of Northern Hemisphere RWB in present-day climate simulations carried out with the ECHAM5-HAM climate model at three different resolutions (T42L19, T63L31, and T106L31) against the ERA-40 reanalysis data set. An objective identification algorithm extracts RWB events from the isentropic PV field and allows quantifying the frequency of occurrence of RWB. The biases in the frequency of RWB are then compared to biases in the time mean tropopause-level jet wind speeds. The ECHAM5-HAM model captures the location of the RWB frequency maxima in the Northern Hemisphere at all three resolutions. However, at coarse resolution (T42L19) the overall frequency of RWB, i.e. the frequency averaged over all seasons and the entire hemisphere, is underestimated by 28%.The higher-resolution simulations capture the overall frequency of RWB much better, with a minor difference between T63L31 and T106L31 (frequency errors of −3.5 and 6%, respectively). The number of large-size RWB events is significantly underestimated by the T42L19 experiment and well represented in the T106L31 simulation. On the local scale, however, significant differences to ERA-40 are found in the higher-resolution simulations. These differences are regionally confined and vary with the season. The most striking difference between T106L31 and ERA-40 is that ECHAM5-HAM overestimates the frequency of RWB in the subtropical Atlantic in all seasons except for spring. This bias maximum is accompanied by an equatorward extension of the subtropical westerlies.
机译:对流层顶破裂的天气尺度罗斯比波(RWB)是温带和亚热带日常天气演变的核心。 RWB导致热量,水分,动量和化学成分的经向传输。 RWB事件在对流层水平电位涡度(PV)字段中表现为细长结构。基于特征的验证方法用于评估在ECHAM5-HAM气候模型以三种不同分辨率(T42L19,T63L31和T106L31)针对ERA-40重新分析数据进行的当今气候模拟中北半球RWB的表示形式组。客观识别算法从等熵PV场提取RWB事件,并允许量化RWB的发生频率。然后将RWB频率的偏差与时间平均对流层顶水平射流风速的偏差进行比较。 ECHAM5-HAM模型以所有三种分辨率捕获北半球RWB频率最大值的位置。但是,在粗分辨率(T42L19)下,RWB的总频率(即所有季节和整个半球的平均频率)被低估了28%。更高分辨率的模拟更好地捕获了RWB的总频率,但差异很小在T63L31和T106L31之间(频率误差分别为-3.5和6%)。 T42L19实验大大低估了大型RWB事件的数量,并在T106L31仿真中很好地表示了这一点。但是,在本地范围内,在更高分辨率的模拟中发现与ERA-40有显着差异。这些差异是区域性的,随季节而变化。 T106L31和ERA-40之间最明显的区别是ECHAM5-HAM高估了除春季以外所有季节的亚热带大西洋地区RWB的频率。该偏差最大值伴随着亚热带西风的赤道扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号