首页> 外文OA文献 >A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.
【2h】

A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.

机译:生物膜袋模型,用于评估生物膜去除和修复,牙周膜成纤维细胞的表面改变和附着方面的不同非手术牙周治疗方式。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIMudThere is a lack of suitable in vitro models to evaluate various treatment modalities intending to remove subgingival bacterial biofilm. Consequently, the aims of this in vitro-study were: a) to establish a pocket model enabling mechanical removal of biofilm and b) to evaluate repeated non-surgical periodontal treatment with respect to biofilm removal and reformation, surface alterations, tooth hard-substance-loss, and attachment of periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts.ududMATERIAL AND METHODSudStandardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently placed into artificially created pockets. Non-surgical periodontal treatment was performed as follows: a) hand-instrumentation with curettes (CUR), b) ultrasonication (US), c) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol (EAP) and d) subgingival air-polishing using erythritol combined with chlorhexidine digluconate (EAP-CHX). The reduction and recolonization of bacterial counts, surface roughness (Ra and Rz), the caused tooth substance-loss (thickness) as well as the attachment of PDL fibroblasts were evaluated and statistically analyzed by means of ANOVA with Post-Hoc LSD.ududRESULTSudAfter 5 treatments, bacterial reduction in biofilms was highest when applying EAP-CHX (4 log10). The lowest reduction was found after CUR (2 log10). Additionally, substance-loss was the highest when using CUR (128±40 µm) in comparison with US (14±12 µm), EAP (6±7 µm) and EAP-CHX (11±10) µm). Surface was roughened when using CUR and US. Surfaces exposed to US and to EAP attracted the highest numbers of PDL fibroblasts.ududCONCLUSIONudThe established biofilm model simulating a periodontal pocket combined with interchangeable placements of test specimens with multi-species biofilms enables the evaluation of different non-surgical treatment modalities on biofilm removal and surface alterations. Compared to hand instrumentation the application of ultrasonication and of air-polishing with erythritol prevents from substance-loss and results in a smooth surface with nearly no residual biofilm that promotes the reattachment of PDL fibroblasts.
机译:背景和目的 ud缺乏用于评估旨在去除龈下细菌生物膜的各种治疗方式的合适的体外模型。因此,该体外研究的目的是:a)建立能够机械去除生物膜的袋模型; b)评估关于生物膜去除和再形成,表面改变,牙齿硬质物质的反复非手术牙周治疗牙周膜(PDL)成纤维细胞的脱落和附着。 ud ud材料和方法 ud使用多物种生物膜将标准化的人类牙本质标本定植3.5天,然后放入人工制作的口袋中。非手术牙周治疗的方法如下:a)用刮匙手动器械(CUR),b)超声(US),c)使用赤藓糖醇(EAP)进行龈下空气抛光,以及d)使用赤藓糖醇结合以下药物进行龈下空气抛光氯己定二葡萄糖酸酯(EAP-CHX)。通过ANOVA和Post-Hoc LSD对细菌数量,表面粗糙度(Ra和Rz),引起的牙齿物质损失(厚度)以及PDL成纤维细胞附着的减少和再定殖进行了评估和统计分析。 ud结果 ud经过5次处理后,使用EAP-CHX时细菌在生物膜上的减少最高(4 log10)。在CUR(2 log10)之后发现最低的降低。此外,与US(14±12 µm),EAP(6±7 µm)和EAP-CHX(11±10)µm相比,使用CUR(128±40 µm)时物质损失最高。使用CUR和US时表面粗糙。 ud ud结论 ud已建立的模拟牙周袋的生物膜模型,结合测试样品与多物种生物膜的可互换放置,可以评估不同的非手术治疗方式去除生物膜和表面变化。与手动仪器相比,超声和赤藓糖醇的空气抛光可防止物质损失,并产生光滑的表面,几乎没有残留的生物膜,可促进PDL成纤维细胞的重新附着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号