首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison between the responses of neutral red and acridine orange: Acridine Orange should be preferential and alternative to neutral red as a dye for the monitoring of contaminants by means of biological sensors
【2h】

A comparison between the responses of neutral red and acridine orange: Acridine Orange should be preferential and alternative to neutral red as a dye for the monitoring of contaminants by means of biological sensors

机译:比较中性红和a啶橙的响应:A啶橙应优先使用,并替代中性红作为染料通过生物传感器监测污染物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The acridine orange (AO) and neutral red (NR) dyes, commonly used as probes to measure the internal pH in acidic vesicles, are compared in this article. The comparison between the two dyes (arising from calculations taking into account their analytical constants) illustrated that the use of AO is preferential to that of NR because the AO response is sensitive over the whole pH range between 4.0 and 7.4, whereas the NR response is effective only between pHs 4.0 and 6.0. In addition, it became evident from the mitochondrial respiration response that NR, unlike AO, is a protonophore. When taken into consideration, these two properties suggest that AO is more suitable than NR as an indicator of toxicity measurements in water samples because the environmental toxic compounds induce pH changes in the acidic vesicles of biological structures that are used as environmental biosensors.
机译:本文比较了cr啶橙(AO)和中性红(NR)染料,这些染料通常用作测量酸性囊泡内部pH的探针。两种染料之间的比较(从考虑到它们的分析常数的计算得出)表明,AO的使用优先于NR,因为AO的响应在4.0到7.4的整个pH范围内都是敏感的,而NR的响应是仅在pH 4.0和6.0之间有效。此外,从线粒体呼吸反应中可以明显看出,NR与AO不同,是质子体。考虑到这两个属性,表明AO比NR更适合作为水样品中毒性测量的指标,因为环境有毒化合物会在用作环境生物传感器的生物结构的酸性囊泡中引起pH值变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号