首页> 外文OA文献 >Does distance e‐learning work? A comparison between distance and face‐to‐face learners using e‐learning materials
【2h】

Does distance e‐learning work? A comparison between distance and face‐to‐face learners using e‐learning materials

机译:远程电子学习有效吗?远程学习者与面对面学习者使用电子学习材料的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compares continual assessment data, intake numbers, retention numbers and final examination grades of a mixed cohort of face‐to‐face and distance learners against similar data from previous years where e‐learning materials were not used in order to test whether e‐learning materials can support the same quality and quantity of teaching and learning for both face‐to‐face and distance learners. The results for this cohort of learners demonstrate that: (i) distance e‐learners score as well and sometimes better than face‐to‐face learners; (ii) face‐to‐face student numbers have increased; (iii) overall, student retention and student attendance have been maintained; (iv) final examination results have been maintained or in some cases improved; (v) lecturer workload was high, but not unmanageable, and it is clear how manageability can be improved.
机译:这项研究将面对面和远程学习者混合人群的连续评估数据,入学人数,保留人数和期末考试成绩与过去几年未使用电子学习材料的相似数据进行了比较,以测试是否学习资料可以为面对面和远程学习者提供相同质量和数量的教学资源。这组学习者的结果表明:(i)远程电子学习者的得分也很高,有时甚至比面对面的学习者更好; (ii)面对面的学生人数增加了; (iii)总体上保持了留学生率和出勤率; (iv)最终检查结果得以维持或在某些情况下有所改善; (v)讲师的工作量很高,但并非难以控制,很明显如何改善可管理性。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号