首页> 外文OA文献 >Five-year results of a randomised comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with zotarolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularisation.
【2h】

Five-year results of a randomised comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with zotarolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularisation.

机译:氮化钛氧化物涂层支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架在冠状动脉血运重建方面的随机比较的五年结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: Stents with a passive coating of titanium-nitride-oxide (TiNO) have been compared with Endeavor® zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) with regard to the primary endpoint of in-stent late lumen loss at six to eight months. The objective of the present analysis was to compare the long-term outcomes of TiNO stents with E-ZES up to five years of clinical follow-up. Methods and results: A total of 302 patients had been randomly allocated to treatment with TiNO or E-ZES. Up to five years of follow-up, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation (TLR), were observed in 27.6% of patients treated with TiNO stents and 25.3% of patients treated with E-ZES (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.72-1.75, p=0.60), with the majority of events related to clinically indicated TVR (TiNO 21.7% versus E-ZES 20.7%, RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.67-1.81). There were no differences with respect to individual events including cardiac death, myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis between the two treatment arms up to five years of follow-up. A majority of patients remained free from angina throughout the entire study duration (TiNO 77.3% versus E-ZES 76.1%, p=0.92). Conclusions: Final five-year outcomes of the TIDE trial comparing TiNO stents with E-ZES revealed increased rates of MACE driven primarily by clinically indicated TVR. The TIDE trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00492908.
机译:目的:比较了在6至8个月内支架内晚期管腔丢失的主要终点,对采用被动氮化钛涂层(TiNO)的支架与Endeavor®佐他莫司洗脱支架(E-ZES)进行了比较。本分析的目的是比较TiNO支架和E-ZES的长期效果,直至五年的临床随访。方法和结果:总共302例患者被随机分配接受TiNO或E-ZES治疗。长达五年的随访,在使用TiNO支架治疗的患者中,观察到主要不良心脏事件(MACE),心脏死亡,心肌梗死或临床指标靶血管血运重建(TLR)的复合物,占27.6%接受E-ZES治疗的患者(RR 1.13,95%CI:0.72-1.75,p = 0.60),大多数事件与临床指示的TVR有关(TiNO 21.7%vs E-ZES 20.7%,RR 1.10,95% CI:0.67-1.81)。在长达五年的随访中,两个治疗组之间在包括心脏死亡,心肌梗塞或支架血栓形成在内的个体事件方面无差异。在整个研究期间,大多数患者都没有心绞痛(TiNO为77.3%,E-ZES为76.1%,p = 0.92)。结论:TIDE试验将TiNO支架与E-ZES进行比较的最后五年结果表明,主要由临床指示的TVR驱动的MACE发生率增加。 TIDE试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册:NCT00492908。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号