首页> 外文OA文献 >A systematic review of study results reported for the evaluation of robotic rollators from the perspective of users
【2h】

A systematic review of study results reported for the evaluation of robotic rollators from the perspective of users

机译:从用户的角度对系统评价机器人滚动体的研究结果进行系统回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and perception of robotic rollators (RRs) from the perspective ofudusers.ududMethods: Studies identified in a previous systematic review published on 2016 on the methodology of studies evaluating RRs by the user perspective were re-screened for eligibility based on the following inclusion criteria: evaluation of the human–robot interaction from the user perspective, use of standardized outcome measurements, and quantitative presentation of study results.ududResults: Seventeen studies were eligible for inclusion. Due to the clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies, a narrative synthesis of study results was conducted. We found conflicting results concerning the effectiveness of the robotic functionalities of the RRs. Only a few studies reported superior user performance or reduced physical demands with the RRs compared to unassisted conditions or conventional assistive mobility devices; however, without providing statistical evidence. The user perception of the RRs was found to be generally positive.ududConclusions: There is still no sufficient evidence on the effectiveness of RRs from the user perspective. More well-designed, high-quality studies with adequate study populations, larger sample sizes, appropriate assessment strategies with outcomes specifically tailored to the robotic functionalities, and statistical analyses of results are required to evaluate RRs at a higher level of evidence.
机译:目的:从 udusers的角度评估机器人旋转器(RRs)的有效性和感知。根据以下纳入标准筛选是否合格:从用户角度评估人机交互,使用标准化结果测量以及研究结果的定量表示。 ud ud结果:有17项研究符合纳入条件。由于研究之间临床和方法的异质性,因此对研究结果进行了叙述性综合。我们发现有关RR机器人功能有效性的矛盾结果。与无辅助条件或常规辅助移动设备相比,只有少数研究报告了RR具有卓越的用户性能或降低的身体需求;但是,没有提供统计证据。发现用户对RR的感觉总体上是正面的。 ud ud结论:从用户的角度来看,仍然没有足够的证据证明RR的有效性。需要进行更精心设计,高质量的研究,要有足够的研究人群,更大的样本量,具有专门针对机器人功能量身定制的结果的适当评估策略以及对结果进行统计分析,才能以更高的证据水平评估RR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号