首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of a final-year module using online asynchronous discussion
【2h】

Evaluation of a final-year module using online asynchronous discussion

机译:使用在线异步讨论评估最后一年的模块

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This report evaluates the use of online asynchronous discussions as a main delivery strategy in a final year undergraduate counselling psychology module. These discussions were student facilitated and the assessment criteria emphasised analysis, critique, application and originality. Students were assessed through the production of a written critique of one of the discussions, again using similar criteria. Student’s judgments of their progress were determined using a single Likert style item scored one to eight, and attitudes to the online components were assessed using seven Likert style items scored one to five. Both of these measures were significantly related to module outcomes. Students were asked for their comments about the module, and the results were analysed using thematic analysis. Overall the results suggest that whilst such a novel delivery strategy has much to commend it, many students perceive it negatively. This seems to be due to the novelty of the strategy, and a belief that traditional lectures and assignments are preferable.
机译:本报告评估了在线异步讨论作为最后一年的本科生辅导心理学模块中的主要交付策略的使用。这些讨论是由学生推动的,评估标准强调分析,批判,应用和独创性。通过对讨论之一进行书面评论,对学生进行了评估,同样使用了类似的标准。学生对自己进步的判断是使用一个得分为1到8的Likert风格项目来确定的,而对在线内容的态度则是使用得分为1到5的7个Likert风格项目来评估的。这两项措施均与模块结果显着相关。要求学生对模块进行评论,然后使用主题分析对结果进行分析。总体而言,结果表明,尽管这种新颖的教学策略值得赞扬,但许多学生对此却持否定态度。这似乎是由于该策略的新颖性,以及相信传统的讲座和作业是可取的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ward T.; Dodd L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号