首页> 外文OA文献 >Approaches to Ensure Quality Standards for Standardized/ Simulated Patient Performance in High Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs)
【2h】

Approaches to Ensure Quality Standards for Standardized/ Simulated Patient Performance in High Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs)

机译:确保高危目标客观结构临床考试(OSCE)中标准化/模拟患者表现的质量标准的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionududTo meet the quality standards for high-stakes OSCEs, it is necessary to ensure high quality standardized performance of the SPs involved.[1] One of the ways this can be assured is through the assessment of the quality of SPs` performance in training and during the assessment. There is some literature concerning validated instruments that have been used to assess SP performance in formative contexts but very little related to high stakes contexts.[2], [3], [4].ududContent and structureududDuring this workshop different approaches to quality control for SPs` performance, developed in medicine, pharmacy and nursing OSCEs, will be introduced. Participants will have the opportunity to use these approaches in simulated interactions. Advantages and disadvantages of these approaches will be discussed.ududAnticipated outcomesududBy the end of this session, participants will be able to discuss the rationale for quality control of SPs` performance in high stakes OSCEs, outline key factors in creating strategies for quality control, identify various strategies for assuring quality control, and reflect on applications to their own practice.ududWho should attendududThe workshop is designed for those interested in quality assurance of SP performance in high stakes OSCEs.ududLevel ududAll levels are welcome. udududReferencesududAdamo G. 2003. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges:1992-2003. Med Teach. 25(3), 262- 270.udWind LA, Van Dalen J, Muijtjens AM, Rethans JJ. Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients). Med Educ 2004, 38(1):39-44.udBouter S, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Bolhuis S. Construction and validation of the Nijmegen Evaluation of the Simulated Patient (NESP): Assessing Simulated Patients' ability to role-play and provide feedback to students. Acad Med: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2012.udMay W, Fisher D, Souder D: Development of an instrument to measure the quality of standardized/simulated patient verbal feedback. Med Educ 2012, 2(1).
机译:简介 ud ud为了满足高风险OSCE的质量标准,有必要确保所涉及SP的高质量标准化性能。[1]可以确保的一种方法是通过评估SP的培训和评估过程中的绩效质量。有一些关于经过验证的工具的文献已被用来评估形成性环境中的SP性能,但与高风险环境几乎没有关系。[2],[3],[4]。 ud ud内容和结构 ud ud研讨会将介绍在医学,药学和护理OSCE中开发的SP绩效质量控制的不同方法。参与者将有机会在模拟互动中使用这些方法。 ud ud预期的结果 ud ud在本次会议结束时,参与者将能够讨论在高风险OSCE中SP绩效的质量控制的基本原理,概述创建过程中的关键因素 ud ud谁应该参加 ud ud本次研讨会是为那些对高风险OSCE中SP性能的质量保证感兴趣的人而设计的。 ud udLevel ud ud欢迎所有级别。 Adud G.2003。《模拟和标准化OSCE中的患者:成就与挑战:1992-2003年》。 Med教学。 25(3),262-270。 udWind LA,Van Dalen J,Muijtjens AM,Rethans JJ。在教育环境中评估模拟患者:MaSP(模拟患者的马斯特里赫特评估)。 Med Educ 2004,38(1):39-44。 udBouter S,van Weel-Baumgarten E,Bolhuis S.模拟患者的奈梅亨评估(NESP)的构建和验证:评估模拟患者的角色扮演能力并向学生提供反馈。 Acad Med:《 2012年美国医学院学报》。 udMay W,Fisher D,Souder D:开发了一种用于测量标准化/模拟患者言语反馈质量的工具。 Med Educ 2012,2(1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号