首页> 外文OA文献 >Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. or not?
【2h】

Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. or not?

机译:技术特征可以在外科手术线性缝合器中发挥重要作用。或不?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Anastomotic leak (AL) after gastrointestinal surgery is a severe complication associated with relevant short- and long-term sequelae. Most of the anastomosis are currently performed with a surgical stapler that is required to have appropriate characteristics to guarantee good performances. The aim of our study was to evaluate, in the laboratory, pressure resistance and tensile strength of anastomosis performed with different surgical linear staplers, available in the market. Materials and methods We have been studying three linear staplers, with diverse cartridges and staple heights, of three different companies, used for gastrointestinal anastomosis and gastric or intestinal closure. We performed 50 anastomosis for each device, with the pertinent different cartridges, on fresh pig intestine, for a total of 350 anastomosis, then injected saline solution and recorded the pressure that provokes a leak on the staple line. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean pressure necessary to induce an AL in the various instruments (P > 0.05). For studying the tensile strength, we performed a total of 350 anastomosis with the different linear staplers on a special strong paper (Tyvek), then recorded the maximal tensile force that could open the anastomosis. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the different staplers about the strength necessary to open the staple line (P > 0.05). Conclusions we demonstrated that different linear staplers of three companies available in the market give comparable anastomotic pressure resistance and tensile strength. This might suggest that small dissimilarities between different devices are not involved, at least as major parameters, in AL etiology.
机译:背景胃肠道手术后的吻合口漏(AL)是一种严重的并发症,与相关的短期和长期后遗症有关。目前,大多数吻合术都是通过手术吻合器进行的,该吻合器需要具有适当的特性以保证良好的性能。我们的研究目的是在实验室中评估市场上可买到的使用不同外科线性缝合器进行吻合术的耐压性和抗张强度。材料和方法我们已经研究了三个不同公司的三种线性订书机,它们的弹药筒和订书钉高度不同,用于肠胃吻合和胃或肠闭合。我们对每个设备在新鲜的猪肠上进行了50次吻合,并使用了相关的不同药筒,总共进行了350次吻合,然后注入盐溶液并记录了引起吻合钉处泄漏的压力。在各种仪器中诱发AL所需的平均压力之间没有统计学上的显着差异(P> 0.05)。为了研究拉伸强度,我们在特殊的强力纸(特卫强)上用不同的线性订书机进行了350次吻合,然后记录了可以打开吻合的最大拉伸力。结果在打开订书钉线所需的强度方面,不同的订书机之间没有统计学上的显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论我们证明了市场上三家公司的不同线性订书机具有相称的吻合耐压性和拉伸强度。这可能表明,AL病因学至少没有作为主要参数参与不同设备之间的细微差别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号