首页> 外文OA文献 >The combination of liver stiffness measurement and NAFLD fibrosis score improves the noninvasive diagnostic accuracy for severe liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
【2h】

The combination of liver stiffness measurement and NAFLD fibrosis score improves the noninvasive diagnostic accuracy for severe liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

机译:肝硬度测量和NAFLD纤维化评分的结合提高了非酒精性脂肪肝患者严重肝纤维化的无创诊断准确性。

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The accuracy of noninvasive tools for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) in clinical practice is still limited. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive tools in two independent cohorts of Italian NAFLD patients.ududMETHODS: We analysed data from 321 Italian patients(179 Sicilian-training cohort, and 142 northern Italy-validation cohort) with an histological diagnosis of NAFLD. Severe fibrosis was defined as fibrosis ≥ F3 according to Kleiner classification. The APRI, AST/ALT, BARD, FIB-4, and NFS scores were calculated according to published algorithms. Liver stiffness measurement(LSM) was performed by FibroScan. Cut-off points of LSM, NFS and FIB-4 for rule-in or rule-out F3-F4 fibrosis were calculated by the reported formulas.ududRESULTS: In the Sicilian cohort AUCs of LSM, NFS, FIB-4, LSM plus NFS, LSM plus FIB-4, and NFS plus FIB-4 were 0.857, 0.803, 0.790, 0.878, 0.888 and 0.807, respectively, while in the northern Italy cohort the corresponding AUCs were 0.848, 0.730, 0.703, 0.844, 0.850, and 0.733 respectively. In the training cohort, the combination of LSM plus NFS was the best performing strategy, providing false positive, false negative and uncertainty area rates of 0%,1.1% and 48% respectively. Similar results were obtained in the validation cohort with false positive, false negative and uncertainty area rates of 0%,7.3% and 40.8%.ududCONCLUSIONS: The combination of LSM with NFS, two complementary, easy-to-perform, and widely available tools, is able to accurately diagnose or exclude the presence of severe liver fibrosis, also reducing of about 50-60% the number of needed diagnostic liver biopsies.
机译:背景与目的:在临床实践中,非侵入性工具用于诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者的严重纤维化的准确性仍然有限。我们旨在评估组合的非侵入性工具在意大利NAFLD患者的两个独立队列中的诊断性能。 ud ud方法:我们采用组织学分析了来自321名意大利患者(179名西西里岛训练队列和142名意大利北部验证队列)的数据诊断NAFLD。根据克莱因氏分类,严重纤维化定义为纤维化≥F3。根据发布的算法计算APRI,AST / ALT,BARD,FIB-4和NFS分数。通过FibroScan进行肝硬度测定(LSM)。通过报告的公式计算了用于法则或法则F3-F4纤维化的LSM,NFS和FIB-4的临界点。 ud ud结果:在LSM,NFS,FIB-4的西西里人队列AUC中, LSM加NFS,LSM加FIB-4和NFS加FIB-4分别为0.857、0.803、0.790、0.878、0.888和0.807,而在意大利北部队列中,相应的AUC分别为0.848、0.730、0.703、0.844、0.850和分别为0.733。在训练队列中,LSM和NFS的组合是效果最好的策略,误报率,误报率和不确定度分别为0%,1.1%和48%。在验证队列中获得了相似的结果,假阳性,假阴性和不确定性区域比率分别为0%,7.3%和40.8%。 ud ud结论:LSM与NFS的组合,两个互补的,易于执行的方法以及广泛可用的工具,能够准确诊断或排除严重肝纤维化的存在,也减少了所需的诊断性肝活检数量的约50-60%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号