首页> 外文OA文献 >Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Acetabulum Reconstruction Technique with Acetabulum Reconstruction Cage and Threaded Rods after Type II Pelvic Resections
【2h】

Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Acetabulum Reconstruction Technique with Acetabulum Reconstruction Cage and Threaded Rods after Type II Pelvic Resections

机译:II型骨盆切除术后采用髋臼重建笼和螺纹杆的新型髋臼重建技术的生物力学分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Periacetabular resections with reconstruction has high rates of complications due to the complexity of the reconstruction. We have improvised a novel technique of reconstruction for type II and type II + III pelvic resections with the use of a commercially available acetabulum reconstruction cage (gap II, Stryker) and threaded rods. Objectives. The aim of our study is to determine the biomechanical strength of our reconstruction compared to the traditional cemented total hip replacement (THR) designs in normal acetabulum and establish its mode of failure. Methods. Five sets of hemipelvises were biomechanically tested (Instron® 3848, MA, USA). These constructs were subjected to cyclic loading and load to failure. Results. The reconstructed acetabulum was stiffer and required a higher load to failure compared to the intact pelvis with a standard THR. The mean stiffness of the reconstructed pelvis was  Nmm−1 compared to the intact pelvis, which was  Nmm−1 ( value = 0.01). The mean load to failure for the standard acetabular cup construct was  N while that of the reconstructed pelvis with the acetabulum cage and threaded rods was  N. Conclusion. Reconstruction of the pelvis with an acetabular reconstruction cage and threaded rods is a biomechanical viable option.
机译:背景。由于重建的复杂性,进行重建的髋臼周围切除术的并发症发生率很高。我们通过使用市售的髋臼重建笼(间隙II,Stryker)和螺纹杆,为II型和II + III型骨盆切除术提出了一种新的重建技术。目标。我们研究的目的是确定与正常髋臼中的传统水泥全髋关节置换术(THR)设计相比,我们重建体的生物力学强度,并确定其失败模式。方法。对五套半盆腔进行了生物力学测试(3848,MA,USA)。这些构造承受循环荷载和荷载破坏。结果。与具有标准THR的完整骨盆相比,重建的髋臼更硬,并且需要更高的失败负荷。与完整的骨盆Nmm-1(值= 0.01)相比,重建骨盆的平均刚度为Nmm-1。标准髋臼杯构造的平均破坏载荷为wasN,而髋臼固定笼和螺杆重建的骨盆的平均破坏载荷为wasN。用髋臼重建笼和螺纹杆重建骨盆是一种生物力学可行的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号