首页> 外文OA文献 >Are juries representative? An examination of the representativeness of jury panels in Hamilton County Tennessee
【2h】

Are juries representative? An examination of the representativeness of jury panels in Hamilton County Tennessee

机译:陪审团有代表性吗?田纳西州汉密尔顿县陪审团的代表性研究

摘要

Under the United States Constitution, a defendant has the right to a trial by jury composed of his or her peers. The intent is for the chosen jurors to be representative of the defendant‟s community. This study examined whether the jury panels in State Court in Hamilton County, Tennessee are representative of the community. A sample of 375 citizens who appeared for jury duty were given a questionnaire that measures the same demographic characteristics that appear in the United States 2010 Census. The results show that compared with the Census, the jury panels are not representative of the citizens who live in Hamilton County. Namely, the jury panels consist of a higher percentage of Whites, males, and citizens with higher levels of education and income. Similar results were found in a sample collected nearly a decade ago when compared with the U. S. Census. The findings from the present study indicate that jury panels may not be demographically representative, and therefore, not composed of a fair cross section of the community. This is the first known study to examine the representativeness of juries. The legal implications and suggestions for future research will be discussed.
机译:根据美国宪法,被告有权要求由其同龄人组成的陪审团审判。目的是让选定的陪审员代表被告所在社区。这项研究调查了田纳西州汉密尔顿县州法院的陪审团是否代表了社区。为375名出任陪审员的公民提供了一份调查表,该调查表测量了与2010年美国人口普查相同的人口统计学特征。结果表明,与人口普查相比,陪审团不能代表居住在汉密尔顿县的居民。即,陪审团由较高比例的白人,男性和受过较高教育和收入的公民组成。与美国人口普查相比,在将近十年前收集的样本中发现了类似的结果。本研究的结果表明,陪审团可能无法在人口统计学上具有代表性,因此不能由社区的公平群体组成。这是审查陪审团代表性的第一项已知研究。将讨论法律含义和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hemmer Brandy L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号