首页> 外文OA文献 >Competency-based versus task-based job descriptions: effects on applicant attraction
【2h】

Competency-based versus task-based job descriptions: effects on applicant attraction

机译:基于胜任力与基于任务的工作描述:对申请人吸引力的影响

摘要

In order for organizations to attract applicants, they need to ensure they are using attractive recruitment materials. Previous research has failed to examine the effect of varying types of job description formats on applicants’ level of attraction to an organization. This study examined applicants’ attraction to organizations based on competency-based and task-based job descriptions. A total of 258 participants were from a Southeastern university, representing three different majors. The job descriptions were individualized based on academic major. Participants read both competency and task-based job descriptions and rated their attraction to each organization. The Big Five and Love of Learning measures were administered, as these constructs could affect attraction to a particular job description. The results of this study suggested no difference in organizational attraction based on competencies or tasks. Love of Learning was not positively related to attraction to the organization with the competency-based description. Openness to experience was positively related to competency-based job descriptions for nursing majors. Implications and future research suggestions are discussed.
机译:为了使组织吸引申请人,他们需要确保他们使用的是有吸引力的招聘材料。先前的研究未能检验不同类型的职位描述格式对申请人对组织的吸引力程度的影响。这项研究基于基于胜任力和基于任​​务的职务说明,研究了申请人对组织的吸引力。东南大学共有258名参与者,分别代表三个专业。职位描述根据学术专业进行个性化设置。参与者阅读能力和基于任​​务的职位描述,并评估他们对每个组织的吸引力。实施了“五巨头”和“热爱学习”措施,因为这些结构可能会影响对特定职位描述的吸引力。这项研究的结果表明,基于能力或任务的组织吸引力没有差异。热爱学习与基于能力的描述对组织的吸引力没有正相关。开放的经验与护理专业的基于能力的职位描述成正相关。讨论了影响和未来的研究建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hawkes Candace Leann;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号