首页> 外文OA文献 >Modeling relative efficiency and productivity change using data envelopment analysis and regression models / Zalina Zahid
【2h】

Modeling relative efficiency and productivity change using data envelopment analysis and regression models / Zalina Zahid

机译:使用数据包络分析和回归模型对相对效率和生产率变化进行建模/ Zalina Zahid

摘要

This thesis developed the panel DEA model to measure the relative efficiency and the productivity change of 17 faculties in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, covering the period, 2000-2005. Three types of approaches were used under the panel DEA model, namely, the contemporaneous, the inter-temporal and the productivity approaches. The first two approaches were incorporated under the two-stage approach to measure efficiency and to determine the effects of selected external factors on efficiency performance. To enhance the robustness of the results, the DEA models were constructed based on three alternative data sets which consisted of different input specifications (DEA1, DEA2 and DEA3). In the first stage of the two-stage approach, two different types of DEA models were fitted on the three data sets. First, the original DEA models were used to compute the efficiency scores. Second, the Super Efficiency DEA models were applied to detect the outliers along the frontiers of the original DEA models. However, when a sensitivity test using the Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was applied, the results showed that the original DEA models were not sensitive to the existence of the outliers along their frontiers. In addition, the original DEA models were also found not to be sensitive to three different input specifications. Therefore, the original DEA models were considered to be robust and appropriate to be used to measure efficiency. Overall, the results showed that the efficiency scores from the three input specifications were consistent and their means of annual efficiency followed the same trend. Using trend analysis, it was shown that UiTM faculties displayed a mixture of patterns in their efficiency performance. A group of 8 faculties exhibited positive trend with non-science faculties consistently performed better than the nonscience faculties. Meanwhile, in the second stage of the two-stage approach, the influences of four selected nondiscretionary factors (age of faculties, percentage of associate professors and above, percentage of part-time students and ratio of non-academic staff to academic staff) on the efficiency of the faculties were determined using two statistical models, namely, OLS Regression and Tobit Regression. Both methods consistently show that the age of faculties has no effect on the efficiency performance across all input specifications. However, the percentage of associate professors and above and the staff ratio were found to be significant under DEA1 and DEA3 specifications. The first variable was negatively related but the second variable was positively related with efficiency. Meanwhile, only the percentage of parttime students was found to be significant and positively correlated with the efficiency scores under all input specifications. In the second approach of the panel DEA model, the DEA based Malmquist Total Factor Productivity (TFP) Index was used to measure the productivity change of the 17 UiTM faculties during the study period. Using DEA1 and DEA2 specifications, it was found that on the average, the 17 UiTM faculties experienced a decrease in their productivity levels over the study period. This was due to the decrease in the technological change but with slight improvement in the technical efficiency.
机译:本文建立了面板DEA模型,用于测量莎阿南(Shah Alam)的Teknologi MARA大学(UiTM)的17个系的相对效率和生产率变化,涵盖了2000-2005年。在面板DEA模型下使用了三种类型的方法,即同时,跨时间和生产率方法。前两种方法被纳入两阶段方法中,以衡量效率并确定所选外部因素对效率绩效的影响。为了增强结果的鲁棒性,DEA模型是基于由不同输入规范(DEA1,DEA2和DEA3)组成的三个替代数据集构建的。在两阶段方法的第一阶段,将两种不同类型的DEA模型拟合到三个数据集上。首先,原始的DEA模型用于计算效率得分。其次,应用超效率DEA模型来检测原始DEA模型沿边界的离群值。但是,当使用Spearman等级相关系数进行敏感性测试时,结果表明原始DEA模型对沿其边界存在异常值不敏感。此外,还发现原始的DEA模型对三种不同的输入规格不敏感。因此,原始的DEA模型被认为是健壮的,适合用于衡量效率。总体而言,结果表明,来自三个输入规格的效率得分是一致的,并且它们的年度效率方式也遵循相同的趋势。使用趋势分析表明,UiTM系在效率绩效方面表现出多种模式。一组8个学院表现出积极的趋势,非科学学院的表现始终优于非科学学院。同时,在两阶段方法的第二阶段,四个选定的非自主因素(教师的年龄,副教授及以上职称的百分比,兼职学生的百分比以及非学术人员与学术人员的比例)的影响使用两种统计模型确定教职员工的效率,即OLS回归和Tobit回归。两种方法始终表明,教师年龄对所有输入规格的效率绩效均没有影响。但是,在DEA1和DEA3规范下,副教授及以上职称的比例和人员比例很重要。第一个变量与效率负相关,而第二个变量与效率正相关。同时,在所有输入条件下,仅发现兼职学生的百分比显着且与效率得分呈正相关。在面板DEA模型的第二种方法中,基于DEA的Malmquist全要素生产率(TFP)指数用于衡量研究期间17个UiTM学院的生产率变化。使用DEA1和DEA2规范,发现在研究期间,平均而言,这17个UiTM系的生产力水平有所下降。这是由于技术变化的减少,但技术效率略有提高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zahid Zalina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号