首页> 外文OA文献 >Perceptions of Human Resource Development Professionals Toward their Professional Association's Standards on Ethics and Integrity
【2h】

Perceptions of Human Resource Development Professionals Toward their Professional Association's Standards on Ethics and Integrity

机译:人力资源开发专业人员对专业协会的道德与诚信标准的看法

摘要

Researchers have identified the complexity of ethical decision making choices and the influences that assorted professional context variables have on one?s ethical frame of reference. To encourage adherence to ethical codes of conduct, professional organizations must recognize the impact that professional context variables have on ethical decision making.The purpose of this study was to examine Human Resource Development professional?s perceptions of the Academy of Human Resource Development?s Standards on Ethics and Integrity specifically regarding applicability, clarity, and importance of statements. Additionally, this study examined whether Hofstede?s Value Survey Module grouped into a three-factor solution.A questionnaire entitled Perceptions of Professionals and Scholars Regarding AHRD?s Standards was adapted from five sources and was piloted to ensure instrument reliability and validity. The main study involved 602 respondents for a response rate of 22% (n = 133). Results of the study indicate that respondents were clear regarding their understanding of the Standards. The highest level of clarity reported was 89.4% and the lowest level of clarity reported was 71.1%. However, respondents were indifferent about their ratings of the application of AHRD?s Standards. The percentages regarding perceived level of application between AHRD?s six statements ranged from 68% (applied) and 28.8% (infrequently applied). Using independent t-test procedures and a series of one-way ANOVAs, differences in levels of agreement were seen in the following groups: educational level, income level, and religious affiliation. Finally, this study examined if participant responses to the items extracted from Hofstede?s Value Survey Module fell into three-factor constructs of individualism/ collectivism, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance. A Principal Component Analysis indicated that the eight statements selected were representative of Hofstede?s three-factor solution of cultural dimensions.Practical implications are discussed regarding these findings, along with explanation for some of the newly developed exploration findings. While the findings of this study were interesting, research related to the influence of professional context variables on ethical decision making needs further examination.
机译:研究人员已经确定了道德决策选择的复杂性,以及各种专业背景变量对一个道德参照系的影响。为了鼓励遵守道德操守准则,专业组织必须认识到专业环境变量对道德决策的影响。本研究的目的是检验人力资源开发专业人员对人力资源开发学院标准的看法。关于道德操守和诚信的声明,特别是关于声明的适用性,清晰性和重要性。此外,本研究还检查了Hofstede的价值调查模块是否分为三因素解决方案。从五个来源改编了名为“专业人士和学者对AHRD标准的看法”的问卷,并进行了试点以确保工具的可靠性和有效性。主要研究包括602名受访者,回应率为22%(n = 133)。研究结果表明,受访者对标准的理解是明确的。报告的最高清晰度为89.4%,最低的清晰度为71.1%。但是,受访者对他们对AHRD标准应用的评价并不关心。在AHRD的六个陈述中,关于应用感知水平的百分比范围从68%(应用)到28.8%(不经常应用)。使用独立的t检验程序和一系列单向方差分析,在以下群体中人们的同意水平存在差异:教育水平,收入水平和宗教信仰。最后,这项研究检查了参与者对从霍夫斯泰德价值调查模块中提取的项目的反应是否属于个人主义/集体主义,权力距离和不确定性避免的三因素构造。主成分分析表明,选择的八种陈述是霍夫斯泰德文化维度的三因素解决方案的代表。讨论了这些发现的实际含义,并解释了一些新近开发的发现。尽管这项研究的结果很有趣,但有关专业背景变量对道德决策影响的研究仍需进一步研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Claus Vanessa A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号