首页> 外文OA文献 >Water Conservation with Urban Landscape Plants
【2h】

Water Conservation with Urban Landscape Plants

机译:城市园林植物的节水

摘要

Water shortages are a common problem in much of the southwest. Increasing urbanization and increasing population places greater demands on dwindling water supplies. Over half of the water used in urban areas of the southwest is used in the irrigation of landscapes. To help cope with increased urban water demands and low water supplies, research was conducted from March 1981 to July 1983 at The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station at Dallas to gain information relative to consumptive water use by native and non-native landscape plants.Twenty weighing lysimeters were constructed and installed and plants established in the lysimeters and adjacent areas. The lysimeters were made from 0.6 X 0.9 m undisturbed cores of Austin silty clay soil. Plants used in the lysimeter study were buffalograss, St. Augustine grass, cenizo, boxwood and Texas barberry. All plants are native to Texas except boxwood and St. Augustine grass. Four lysimeters were planted to each plant type. This allowed two moisture levels and two replications of each plant type.There was no difference in water use by St. Augustine grass and buffalo grass during the year of establishment. Daily water use ranged from 0.49 to 0.08 cm per day but was generally 50% class A pan evaporation. St. Augustine grass used 0.03 cm/day more water than buffalo grass during 1982. -Irrigation treatments used in 1982 did not influence water use by either grass type but buffalo grass retained higher quality under dry treatment (irrigated at 0.40 bar moisture tension) than St. Augustine grass. Water use from May to July 1983 was highest (of all treatments) by St. Augustine grass when irrigated at 0.25 bar soil moisture tension at 76 cm depth and lowest (of all treatments) by buffalograss when irrigated at 0.75 bar soil moisture tension at 76 cm depth.Application of 50% class A pan evaporation each week appears to be an acceptable guideline for irrigation of either turfgrass but research should be conducted over a longer time period to obtain more specific guidelines for each grass species.Water use by shrubs in lysimeters was variable and not influenced by plant type during the period of establishment (Fall 1981). During 1982 water use was influenced more by plant size than by specie or water level. Cenizo had much faster growth rate than the other shrubs in the study.Water use by container grown plants indicated that cenizo had higher water use efficiency than boxwood or Indian Hawthorn. Water use was determined for several native shrubs and of the ones compared, Texas barberry appeared to have the most promise for use in water conserving landscapes.
机译:在西南许多地区,缺水是一个普遍的问题。日益城市化和人口增长对水供应的减少提出了更高的要求。西南城市地区用水的一半以上用于景观灌溉。为了应对不断增长的城市用水需求和低水供应,1981年3月至1983年7月在达拉斯的德克萨斯农业实验站进行了研究,以获取有关本地和非本地景观植物用水量的信息。在测渗仪和邻近区域中建造并安装了工厂,并建立了工厂。溶渗仪由0.6 x 0.9 m的奥斯丁粉质粘土土壤原状芯制成。溶渗仪研究中使用的植物是水牛,圣奥古斯丁草,长青花,黄杨木和德克萨斯伏牛花。除黄杨木和圣奥古斯丁草外,所有植物都来自德克萨斯州。每种植物都种植了四个测渗仪。这样可以使每个植物类型具有两个水分含量和两次重复性。在建立年份,圣奥古斯丁草和水牛草的用水量没有差异。每天的用水量为0.49至0.08厘米/天,但通常为50%的A级锅蒸发量。 1982年,圣奥古斯丁草比水牛草多耗水0.03厘米/天。-1982年使用的灌溉方法均不影响两种草的用水量,但水牛草在干燥处理下(以0.40 bar的水分张力灌溉)保持较高的质量。圣奥古斯丁草。 1983年5月至1983年7月,圣奥古斯丁草的用水量(在所有处理方法中)最高,是在76 cm深度处以0.25 bar的土壤水分张力灌溉时,而水牛在76深度处是0.75 bar的土壤水分胁迫时最低(在所有处理法中)厘米深度。每周施用50%的A类锅具蒸发似乎是两种草皮草灌溉的可接受准则,但应进行较长时间的研究以获得每种草类的更具体准则。在建立期间(1981年秋季),它是可变的,不受植物类型的影响。 1982年期间,用水量受植物大小的影响大于受物种或水位的影响。研究中,Cenizo的生长速度比其他灌木快得多。容器生长植物的用水表明Cenizo的用水效率比黄杨木或印度山楂树高。确定了几种原生灌木的用水量,在比较的情况下,德克萨斯伏牛花似乎最有可能用于节水景观。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1983
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 19:41:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号