首页> 外文OA文献 >Caribbean Precipitation in Observations and IPCC AR4 Models
【2h】

Caribbean Precipitation in Observations and IPCC AR4 Models

机译:观测中的加勒比降水和IPCC AR4模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A census of 24 coupled (CMIP) and 13 uncoupled (AMIP) models from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fourth assessment report (AR4) were compared with observations and reanalysis to show varied ability of the models to simulate Caribbean precipitation and mechanisms related to precipitation in the region. Not only were errors seen in the annual mean, with CMIP models underestimating both rainfall and sea surface temperature (SST) and AMIP models overestimating rainfall, the annual cycle was also incorrect. Large overestimates of precipitation at all SSTs (and particularly above 28 degrees C) and at vertical circulations less than -10hPa/day (the deep convective regime) were inherent in the atmospheric models with models using spectral type convective parameterizations performing best. In coupledmodels, however, errors in the frequency of occurrence of SSTs (the distribution is cold biased) and deep convective vertical circulations (reduced frequency) lead to an underestimation of Caribbean mean precipitation. On daily timescales, the models were shown to produce too frequent light rainfall amounts (especially less than 1mm/day) and dry extremes and too few heavy rainfall amounts and wet extremes. The simulation of the mid-summer drought (MSD) proved a challenge for the models, despite their ability to produce a Caribbean low-level jet (CLLJ) in the correct location. Errors in the CLLJ, such as too strong magnitude and weak semi-annual cycle, were worse in the CMIP models and were attributed to problems with the location and seasonal evolution of the North Atlantic subtropical high (NASH) in both CMIP and AMIP models. Despite these discrepancies between models and observations, the ability of the models to simulate the correlation between the CLLJ and precipitation varied based on season and region, with the connection with United States precipitation particularly problematic in the AMIP simulations. An observational study of intraseasonal precipitation in the Caribbean showed an explicit connection between the Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) and Caribbean precipitation for the first time. Precipitation anomalies up to 50 percent above (below) the annual mean are observed in phases 1 and 2 (5 and 6) of the MJO and are related to changes in the CLLJ, that is also modulated by the MJO. Considerable progress has been made on identifying both problems and successes in the simulation of Caribbean climate in general circulation models, but many areas still require investigation.
机译:将政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告(AR4)的24个耦合(CMIP)和13个非耦合(AMIP)模型的普查与观察和重新分析进行比较,以显示该模型模拟加勒比地区降水和机制的不同能力与该地区的降水有关。不仅在年均误差中看到了误差,CMIP模型低估了降雨量和海面温度(SST),而AMIP模型高估了降雨量,年度周期也不正确。在所有SST(尤其是高于28摄氏度)和垂直循环低于-10hPa / day(深对流状态)的降水中,大气模型的高估都是固有的,其中使用光谱类型对流参数化的模型效果最好。但是,在耦合模型中,海表温度发生频率(分布偏冷)和深对流垂直环流(频率降低)的误差导致对加勒比海平均降水的低估。在日常时间尺度上,模型显示出太频繁的降雨(特别是少于1毫米/天)和极端干旱,太少的降雨和极端潮湿。尽管模型具有在正确位置产生加勒比低空急流(CLLJ)的能力,但对仲夏干旱(MSD)的模拟证明了这些模型的挑战。在CMIP模型中,CLLJ的误差(如强度太强和半年周期弱)在CMIP和AMIP模型中更严重,并且归因于北大西洋副热带高压(NASH)的位置和季节演变问题。尽管模型和观测值之间存在这些差异,但是模型模拟CLLJ和降水之间的相关性的能力根据季节和地区而有所不同,与美国降水的联系在AMIP模拟中尤其成问题。一项对加勒比海季节内降水的观测研究首次显示了马登-朱利安振荡(MJO)与加勒比海降水之间的明确联系。在MJO的第1和第2阶段(5和6)观测到的年平均降水异常高出(低于)年平均值的50%,这与CLLJ的变化有关,CLLJ的变化也受到MJO的调节。在确定一般环流模型中加勒比气候模拟的问题和成功方面已经取得了相当大的进展,但是许多领域仍然需要调查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin Elinor Ruth;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号