首页> 外文OA文献 >Fetishes of 'empowerment': the arguments, the confusions in contemporary feminist theory
【2h】

Fetishes of 'empowerment': the arguments, the confusions in contemporary feminist theory

机译:“赋权”的迷恋:当代女性主义理论的争论和困惑

摘要

?Empowerment? is a term used liberally throughout feminist theory. However, the term has a number of assumed meanings, depending upon the context of its use. In this dissertation, I examine primarily second-wave feminist theory arguments, dividing the concepts according to quadrants of human experience (Habermas, Wilber) in order to reveal the context of the theorists? views of ?empowerment.? I also examine relevant worldview perspectives (Beck & Cowan, Graves) within each quadrant in order to reveal the underlying assumptions about what it is hoped ?empowerment? might achieve. I show that there are two primary types of ?empowerment?: empowerment of the autonomous self and empowerment of the relational self. These two distinctive types are of utmost importance because, though largely unacknowledged, they lie as the core foundation of conceptual frameworks that divide feminists into two opposing camps. Further, within these two primary types, there are diverse, nuanced understandings of ?empowerment? that are based upon varied notions of what it should accomplish.
机译:赋权?是在整个女权主义理论中广泛使用的术语。然而,根据其使用的上下文,该术语具有许多假定的含义。在本文中,我主要考察第二波女权主义理论论点,根据人类经验的象限(哈贝马斯,威尔伯)对概念进行划分,以揭示理论家的背景。赋予权力的观点。我还研究了每个象限中的相关世界观视角(Beck&Cowan,Graves),以揭示有关希望“赋权”的基本假设。可能实现。我展示了“授权”的两种主要类型:自治自主的授权和关系自我的授权。这两种截然不同的类型极为重要,因为尽管在很大程度上未被承认,但它们却是将女权主义者分为两个相对的阵营的概念框架的核心基础。此外,在这两种主要类型中,对“授权”有多种细微差别的理解。基于对它应该完成的工作的不同观念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilson Elizabeth Ann;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号