首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring interests: are there relationships among general interests, reading interests, and personality dimensions?
【2h】

Exploring interests: are there relationships among general interests, reading interests, and personality dimensions?

机译:探索兴趣:一般兴趣,阅读兴趣和人格维度之间是否存在关系?

摘要

This study explored the relationships among high school students? general interests, reading interests, and personality dimensions. Two hundred and fifty one 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade students in a rural school district in east central Texas completed three questionnaires. General interests were determined by the Strong Interest Explorer, personality dimensions were determined by the Big Five Inventory, and book reading interests were determined by the Reading Interest Rating Scale. The reading interest scores were adjusted for reading ability based on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) English/Language Arts scale scores.A factor analysis including six general interest variables, five personality variables, and four reading interest variables was conducted. The analysis yielded five factors. Factor 1 had the highest loadings from Holland?s general interest types. Factor 2 was dominated by the book categories (Contemporary Fiction, Fact-based Literature, Poetry, and Modern Fantasy). Factors 3, 4, and 5 had the highest loadings from the personality dimensions. Factor 3 included Openness, Factor 4 included Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism, and Factor 5 included Extraversion. Factor 3, which accounted for 11.67% of the variance, was the only factor where a personality variable (Openness), a general interest variable (Artistic), and a reading interest variable (Modern Fantasy) loaded moderately to highly together. In this particular case alone, teachers may help students select materials that match their personal needs and personalities (Lau & Cheung, 1988) by recommending texts in the modern fantasy genre to those who exhibit openness and value artistic expression. With the exception of Openness, none of the Big Five Personality Dimensions loaded with a book category. There was also only one strong book category and general interest loading. Reading interests appear to be exclusive of general life interests and personality dimensions. Based on the findings, it appears that text-based situational interest is evoked by topics or ideas that are universally appealing (Hidi & Anderson, 1992). Since text-based interest can be controlled by teachers to some degree (Krapp, Hidi, & Renninger, 1992; Schraw, Flowerday, & Lehman, 2001), promoting student independence and choice should broaden students? interests and help increase intrinsic motivation to read (Deci, 1992).
机译:这项研究探讨了高中生之间的关系?总体兴趣,阅读兴趣和人格维度。在得克萨斯州中部东部一个农村学区的251名9、10、11和12年级学生填写了三份问卷。一般兴趣由“强兴趣浏览器”确定,人格维度由“五大清单”确定,书籍阅读兴趣由“阅读兴趣等级量表”确定。根据德克萨斯州知识和技能评估(TAKS)英语/语言艺术量表的得分对阅读兴趣分数进行了调整,进行了因素分析,包括六个一般兴趣变量,五个人格变量和四个阅读兴趣变量。分析得出五个因素。因子1具有荷兰一般利益类型的最高负荷。因子2由书籍类别(当代小说,基于事实的文学,诗歌和现代幻想)主导。从人格维度来看,因素3、4和5具有最高的负荷。因素3包括开放性,因素4包括尽责性,宜人性和神经质,因素5包括外向性。因子3占方差的11.67%,是个性变量(开放性),一般兴趣变量(艺术性)和阅读兴趣变量(现代幻想)中度到高度一致的唯一因素。仅在这种特殊情况下,教师就可以通过向那些表现出开放性和重视艺术表现力的人推荐现代幻想类型的文本,来帮助学生选择适合其个人需求和个性的材料(Lau&Cheung,1988)。除“开放性”外,“五个大人物”维度均未加载书目类别。此外,只有一本强壮的书籍类别,而且兴趣广泛。阅读兴趣似乎不包括一般生活兴趣和人格维度。根据这些发现,看来基于文本的情境兴趣是由普遍具有吸引力的主题或思想引起的(Hidi&Anderson,1992)。由于基于文本的兴趣可以在一定程度上由教师控制(Krapp,Hidi和Renninger,1992; Schraw,Flowerday和Lehman,2001),因此,促进学生的独立性和选择能力应该扩大学生的学习范围吗?兴趣并帮助增加阅读的内在动力(Deci,1992)。

著录项

  • 作者

    West Courtney Ann;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号