首页> 外文OA文献 >Political institutions, public management, and bureaucratic performance: political-bureaucratic interactions and their effect on policy outcomes
【2h】

Political institutions, public management, and bureaucratic performance: political-bureaucratic interactions and their effect on policy outcomes

机译:政治机构,公共管理和官僚行为:政治-官僚互动及其对政策成果的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This project examines the determinants of political responsiveness tobureaucratic performance. A large literature exists that has examined how bureaucraticagencies are responsive to political institutions. While policy theory contends that thereverse is also true ? that is, political institutions engage in political assessment ofpolicies ? there is little empirical literature examining this important question. Indeed,research in public administration suggests that political responsiveness only occursfollowing massive bureaucratic failure or policy crises. Using data from Texas publicschool districts, this dissertation explores the role of policy salience in determining thelikelihood of political responsiveness to bureaucratic outputs and outcomes.The findings suggest that issue salience is the key determinant of politicalinvolvement in administration. Furthermore, this project incorporates the concepts ofdescriptive and substantive representation in examining these questions. The resultsindicate that policy salience depends on the composition of the interests of politicalinstitutions. Furthermore, race and ethnicity work to shape those preferences and, inturn, condition what policy makers deem as salient. The findings suggest that descriptively unrepresentative political institutions are less likely to be responsive to theneeds of those who are not represented (e.g. Latino students). Thus, representation iscentral to political responsiveness when the policy outputs or outcomes in question arenot universally salient.Finally, this project examines whether political institutions can influence policyoutcomes, and, more importantly, what factors ? environmental, organizational,managerial ? either facilitate or constrain the political influence of elected officials. Thefindings suggest that goal and preference alignment between political institutions andbureaucratic agencies is critical in enhancing political influence ? a finding that iscommonly argued in formal models of political control, but rarely tested empirically.This research also finds that bureaucratic power or independence can work to hinderpolitical influence of policy outputs.
机译:该项目研究了对官僚政治表现的政治反应的决定因素。现有大量文献研究了官僚机构对政治制度的反应。虽然政策理论认为逆反法也成立?就是说,政治机构从事对政治的政治评估?很少有经验文献研究这个重要问题。确实,对公共行政的研究表明,只有在大规模官僚主义失败或政策危机之后才发生政治反应。本文利用得克萨斯州公立学区的数据,探讨了政策显着性在确定政治对官僚产出和结果的反应可能性方面的作用。研究结果表明,问题显着性是政治参与行政管理的关键决定因素。此外,该项目在研究这些问题时结合了描述性和实质性表示的概念。结果表明,政策的显着性取决于政治制度利益的构成。此外,种族和族裔努力塑造这些偏好,进而限制政策制定者认为是突出的。研究结果表明,描述性的无代表性的政治制度不太可能响应那些没有代表性的人(例如拉丁裔学生)的需求。因此,当所讨论的政策产出或结果并非普遍显着时,代表制就集中在政治响应能力上。最后,该项目研究了政治制度是否可以影响政策成果,更重要的是,哪些因素?环境,组织,管理?促进或限制民选官员的政治影响力。研究结果表明,政治机构与官僚机构之间​​的目标和偏好一致性对于增强政治影响力至关重要。这一发现在正式的政治控制模型中经常被争论,但很少经过实证检验。该研究还发现,官僚权力或独立性可以阻碍政策产出的政治影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hawes Daniel Prophet;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号