首页> 外文OA文献 >Executive function processes: inhibition, working memory, planning and attention in children and youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
【2h】

Executive function processes: inhibition, working memory, planning and attention in children and youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:执行功能过程:患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的儿童和青少年的抑制,工作记忆,计划和注意力

摘要

This study examines the roles of inhibition, attention, working memory, andplanning in youth with and without ADHD. As conceptualized in theories of attention,inhibition, and working memory, difficulties with these executive processes interact tomanifest in the behavioral syndrome(s) of ADHD. Barkley (1997) proposed disinhibitionas the primary deficit of ADHD. Rapport, Chung, Shore, Denney, & Isaacs, (2000)theorized that ADHD results from a primary deficit in working memory. Mirsky (1987)proposed a model of attention which children with ADHD have deficits in abilities tofocus/execute, encode and sustain attention. Posner and Petersen (1990) proposed thatthree attentional networks are responsible for attentional processes and those childrenwith ADHD have deficits in the vigilance network. To investigate the contributions ofinhibition, working memory, attention, and planning in executive dysfunction in childrenwith ADHD, measures were selected from factor analytic studies.Children with ADHD-Combined Type demonstrated poorer inhibition andworking memory than children with no diagnosis after controlling for IQ effects. Nodifferences in planning and attention were indicated after controlling for IQ effects.However, a predictive discriminant analysis indicated that none of the executiveprocesses contributed to the prediction of group membership. Given correlational andpredictive discriminant analysis results, further analyses were conducted to investigatethe contribution of the measures selected for the domains. The theoretical model did notrepresent a good fit of the data. A three-factor model indicated the best representationsuggesting that inhibition and attention were not separable. There were no groupdifferences with the revised measurement model for inhibition/attention, workingmemory and planning. Taken together, results indicated measures originally selected totap executive function may not be clean measures of inhibition, working memory,planning, or attention processes. In addition, recently proposed theories overlap andconceptualize the multiple constructs involved in ADHD with a variety ofmethodologies, further contributing to difficulties in interpreting results andmeasurement issues.
机译:这项研究探讨了在有或没有多动症的年轻人中抑制,注意力,工作记忆和计划的作用。正如在注意力,抑制和工作记忆理论中所概念化的那样,这些执行过程的困难在多动症的行为综合征中相互作用。 Barkley(1997)提出将去抑制作用作为多动症的主要缺陷。 Rapport,Chung,Shore,Denney和Isaacs(2000)提出多动症是由工作记忆的主要缺陷引起的。 Mirsky(1987)提出了注意力集中模型,注意力缺陷多动症儿童在集中/执行,编码和维持注意力方面的能力不足。波斯纳和彼得森(Posner and Petersen,1990)提出,三个注意力网络负责注意力过程,患有多动症的儿童的警惕性网络不足。为了研究抑制,工作记忆,注意力和计划在多动症儿童执行功能障碍中的作用,从因素分析研究中选择了措施。与多动症合并型儿童相比,控制智商后儿童的抑制力和工作记忆能力较没有诊断的儿童差。控制智商影响后,在计划和注意力上没有差异。但是,预测判别分析表明,没有执行过程有助于预测组成员身份。给定相关性和预测性判别分析结果,进行了进一步的分析以调查针对这些域选择的度量的贡献。理论模型不能很好地拟合数据。三因素模型显示了最好的表示,这表明抑制和注意力不可分离。修订后的测量模型在抑制/注意,工作记忆和计划方面没有群体差异。两者合计,结果表明最初选择用来执行功能的措施可能不是抑制,工作记忆,计划或注意过程的干净措施。另外,最近提出的理论以多种方法重叠并概念化了ADHD中涉及的多种结构,进一步加剧了解释结果和测量问题的难度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wolfe Monica Eileen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号