首页> 外文OA文献 >Explaining congressional reform: electoral laws, congressional organization, and the balance of power between party leaders and backbenchers in Latin American national legislatures
【2h】

Explaining congressional reform: electoral laws, congressional organization, and the balance of power between party leaders and backbenchers in Latin American national legislatures

机译:解释国会改革:选举法,国会组织,以及拉丁美洲国家立法机构中政党领袖与后座议员之间的权力平衡

摘要

This research addresses the question under what conditions will rank and filelegislators favor or oppose changes in a legislature?s internal rules of order. The studydeviates from previous approaches to the study of legislatures in four primary ways: 1) thestudy moves from advanced democratized cases of the U.S. Congress and British House ofCommons to cases of neo-democracies; 2) the study considers the interaction between thedesign of the electoral system and its impact on legislature organization; 3) in addition tochamber level factors, party and individual level factors are considered; and 4) the theoryconsiders when legislators will rebel against attempts by party leadership to alter the internalrules of order.The central question focused on is what factors influence legislators? willingness tospeak out or vote against changes in the internal rules of order following a change in theelectoral system design. The theory proposed that when it comes to changing the internalrules of order of a legislative chamber, the effective number of parties in the chamber, the effect of proposed changes in the rules of order on legislator behavior, party discipline, andthe nature of legislator ambition affect the probability that change occurs.Experimental and statistical methodologies are used to test the hypotheses derivedfrom the theory. Original data were collected from experiments conducted onundergraduate pupils at Texas A&M University. For the statistical analyses, a data set ofproposed changes in the rules of order were compiled using archived data from theColombian Senate and Peruvian Congress. This multi-method approach was used becauseof the nature of the question under examination and to minimize limitations of theindividual methodologies.The experimental analyses demonstrate that the operations of the theory aresupported in the controlled environment of the experiment. The results from the statisticalanalyses were, within the restrictions imposed by the data, consistent with both theoreticalexpectations and the experimental findings. The most consistent factor influencing changein the rules of order is the effect of the proposal followed by party discipline.
机译:这项研究解决了一个问题,即在什么条件下等级和文件立法者会赞成或反对立法机构内部秩序规则的变更。该研究与以前的立法机构研究方法不同,主要有以下四个方面:1)研究从美国国会和英国众议院的民主化高级案例转向新民主主义案例; 2)研究考虑了选举制度的设计与其对立法组织的影响之间的相互作用; 3)除会议室级别因素外,还应考虑团体级别和个人级别因素; (4)理论考虑了立法者何时会反抗党领导改变秩序内部规则的企图。中心问题集中在哪些因素影响立法者?选举制度设计变更后,对内部秩序规则的变更发表意见或反对的意愿。该理论提出,当涉及更改立法会议场秩序的内部规则时,会议厅中有效党的数目,拟议的议事规则变更对立法者行为,政党纪律的影响以及立法者野心的性质都会受到影响。实验和统计方法被用于检验从该理论得出的假设。原始数据是从对德克萨斯A&M大学的本科生进行的实验中收集的。为了进行统计分析,使用哥伦比亚参议院和秘鲁国会的存档数据汇编了一组议事规则拟议变更的数据集。之所以使用这种多方法的方法,是因为要检查的问题的性质以及最大程度地减少单个方法的局限性。实验分析表明,该理论的操作在实验的受控环境中得到了支持。在数据所施加的限制内,统计分析的结果与理论预期和实验结果均一致。影响顺序规则变化的最一致的因素是提案的效果,其次是党纪。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heath Roseanna Michelle;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号