首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk assessment of surface vs subsea blowout preventers (bops) on mobile offshore drilling units focusing on riser failure and the use of subsea shear rams
【2h】

Risk assessment of surface vs subsea blowout preventers (bops) on mobile offshore drilling units focusing on riser failure and the use of subsea shear rams

机译:海上移动式钻井平台上的防地表与海底防喷器(bops)风险评估,重点在于冒口故障和海底剪力锤的使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of a slim, high-pressure drilling riser for surface blowout preventer operations in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico was assessed as an alternative to conventional drilling procedures from floating units. Comparison of the low- and high-pressure system was accomplished through a detailed qualitative (assigned frequency) and quantitative (reported incidents) risk analysis using generic fault tree models to statistically determine the reliability of the system based on metocean conditions from the Gulf of Mexico. It is hoped that this investigation will serve as a starting point for drilling companies and regulatory agencies to understand the risk of implementing a high-pressure riser for surface blowout preventer applications in the Gulf of Mexico, because specific failure events and conditions of the area were considered. Despite the generic description of the drilling riser and pressure control system, the models are flexible enough to be modified and adapted to a specific rig configuration and location. Results from the qualitative comparison suggest an acceptable risk and high reliability for high-pressure riser systems and surface preventers. The quantitative portion of the study is influenced by the data quality of the high-pressure system, however it provides a range of possible reliability values with an acceptable overall risk.
机译:据评估,在墨西哥湾深水区的地面防喷器操作中使用细长的高压钻井立管,可以替代浮动装置的常规钻井程序。低压和高压系统的比较是通过详细的定性(指定频率)和定量(报告的事件)风险分析来完成的,该分析使用通用故障树模型来基于墨西哥湾的大洋条件从统计学上确定系统的可靠性。希望该调查可以作为钻井公司和监管机构了解在墨西哥湾实施用于地面防喷器应用高压立管的风险的起点,因为该地区的具体故障事件和条件是考虑过的。尽管对钻井冒口和压力控制系统进行了一般性描述,但这些模型具有足够的灵活性,可以修改并适应特定的钻机配置和位置。定性比较的结果表明,高压立管系统和表面预防器具有可接受的风险和较高的可靠性。研究的定量部分受高压系统数据质量的影响,但它提供了一系列可能的可靠性值,并且具有可接受的总体风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Melendez Jorge Luis;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号