首页> 外文OA文献 >Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
【2h】

Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds

机译:土地所有者对德克萨斯州两个流域成本分摊刷管理计划的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the expanding population of Texas and the resulting increase in demand for water, the scarcity of water is becoming an increasingly urgent issue and research is being conducted to find ways to improve water yield, the amount of water that is used for aquifer recharge and riparian areas (lakes, streams, etc). Rangelands provide a major catchment for both surface reservoirs and aquifers. The Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and the Twin Buttes Drainage Area were selected to determine the tradeoffs between brush management for increased water yield and wildlife habitat improvement. In April 2002, a mail survey of 300 randomly selected landowners was conducted in each of the two watersheds to gain information regarding their demographics, land cover, and willingness to enter into a cost-share brush removal program. A total of 131 usable questionnaires (43.7%) were returned by Edwards Aquifer area participants, and 141 usable questionnaires (47.0%) were returned by Twin Buttes area participants. Respondents were asked questions including attitudes towards brush amounts and management strategies, and certain constraints that may be included in a cost-share brush removal program. Most respondents indicated interest in enrolling at least part of their land in such a program. Reasoning behind interest varied in each study area. However, interest in various contractual agreements was neutral at best. Policy implications entail considering wildlife habitat mitigation, landowners' preferences, and potential for increasing water yield and determining if all can be managed, or if trade-offs must be considered.
机译:随着得克萨斯州人口的增长以及对水的需求增加,水的短缺正成为日益紧迫的问题,并且正在进行研究以寻找提高水产量,用于含水层补给和河岸的水量的方法。区域(湖泊,溪流等)。牧场为地表水库和含水层提供了主要集水区。选择了爱德华兹含水层补给区和双小山流域,以决定在增加水产量的刷管理与改善野生动植物栖息地之间的权衡。 2002年4月,在两个流域中的每个流域中对300个随机选择的土地所有者进行了邮件调查,以获取有关其人口统计,土地覆盖以及是否愿意参加成本分担的除毛程序的信息。 Edwards Aquifer地区参与者共返回了131份问卷(43.7%),Twin Buttes地区参与者共返回了141份问卷(47.0%)。受访者被问到一些问题,包括对刷子数量和管理策略的态度,以及成本分担刷子清除计划中可能包含的某些限制。大多数受访者表示有兴趣将其土地的至少一部分纳入该计划。兴趣背后的推理在每个研究领域各不相同。但是,对各种合同协议的兴趣充其量是中立的。政策含义包括考虑减轻野生动植物栖息地,土地所有者的偏好以及增加水产量的潜力,并确定是否可以全部管理或必须权衡取舍。

著录项

  • 作者

    Narayanan Christopher Ram;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号