首页> 外文OA文献 >Establishment of a new initial dose plan for vancomycin using the generalized linear mixed model
【2h】

Establishment of a new initial dose plan for vancomycin using the generalized linear mixed model

机译:使用广义线性混合模型建立新的万古霉素初始剂量计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: When administering vancomycin hydrochloride (VCM), the initial doseis adjusted to ensure that the steady-state trough value (Css-trough) remains withinthe effective concentration range. However, the Css-trough (population mean methodpredicted value [PMMPV]) calculated using the population mean method (PMM) oftendeviate from the effective concentration range. In this study, we used the generalizedlinear mixed model (GLMM) for initial dose planning to create a model that accuratelypredicts Css-trough, and subsequently assessed its prediction accuracy.Methods: The study included 46 subjects whose trough values were measured afterreceiving VCM. We calculated the Css-trough (Bayesian estimate predicted value [BEPV])from the Bayesian estimates of trough values. Using the patients’ medical data, we createdmodels that predict the BEPV and selected the model with minimum information criterion(GLMM best model). We then calculated the Css-trough (GLMMPV) from the GLMM bestmodel and compared the BEPV correlation with GLMMPV and with PMMPV.Results: The GLMM best model was {[0.977 + (males: 0.029 or females: -0.081)] ×PMMPV + 0.101 × BUN/adjusted SCr – 12.899 × SCr adjusted amount}. The coefficients ofdetermination for BEPV/GLMMPV and BEPV/PMMPV were 0.623 and 0.513, respectively.Conclusion: We demonstrated that the GLMM best model was more accurate inpredicting the Css-trough than the PMM.
机译:背景:施用万古霉素盐酸盐(VCM)时,应调整初始剂量,以确保稳态谷值(Css-谷)保持在有效浓度范围内。但是,使用总体均值法(PMM)计算的Css谷(人口均值法预测值[PMMPV])通常偏离有效浓度范围。在这项研究中,我们使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行初始剂量规划,以创建能够准确预测Css谷的模型,然后评估其预测准确性。方法:本研究包括46名受试者,他们在接受VCM后测量了谷值。我们从波谷值的贝叶斯估计值计算了Css-波谷(贝叶斯估计预测值[BEPV])。利用患者的医疗数据,我们创建了预测BEPV的模型,并选择了信息量最少的模型(GLMM最佳模型)。然后,我们根据GLMM最佳模型计算了Css谷(GLMMPV),并将BEPV相关性与GLMMPV和PMMPV进行了比较。结果:GLMM最佳模型为{[0.977 +(男性:0.029或女性:-0.081)]×PMMPV + 0.101×BUN /调整后的SCr – 12.899×调整后的SCr}。 BEPV / GLMMPV和BEPV / PMMPV的测定系数分别为0.623和0.513。结论:我们证明GLMM最佳模型比PMM更准确地预测了Css谷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号