首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy of Hyperthermia Treatment in combination with radio- or chemotherapy in Breast-, Bladder-, Cervix Carcinoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients. Update 2012
【2h】

Efficacy of Hyperthermia Treatment in combination with radio- or chemotherapy in Breast-, Bladder-, Cervix Carcinoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients. Update 2012

机译:在乳房癌,膀胱癌,子宫颈癌和软组织肉瘤患者中,热疗联合放疗或化疗的疗效。更新2012

摘要

Objective: To synthesise the evidence on efficacy of hyperthermia in combination with radio- or chemotherapy in breast-, bladder-, cervix carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma patients. Methods: Based on two previous systematic reviews, a systematic literature search in four databases with identical search terms was carried out in order to find randomised clinical trials. Results: 2 RCTs for breast cancer, 2 RCTs for bladder cancer, 3 RCTs for cervix carcinoma, 1 RCT for bladder and cervix and 1 RCT for soft tissue sarcoma were found. Overall, of the 1265 patients 656 were allocated to receive treatment with hyperthermia in combination with radio- or chemotherapy. Where CR or PR was assessed (in 6 from 9 trials) hyperthermia showed statistical significant outcomes. Some of the trials assessed DFS (3/9) or PFS (2/9): all of them show superiority of the hyperthermia arm. Of the 9 publications providing OS data only 1 shows a statistical significant improvement in overall survival, thus proposing that the surrogate endpoints do not translate into a survival benefit and that hyperthermia leads to temporal effects only. QoL was not assessed in any of the trials. The reporting of safety data was consistent across the studies showing a trend towards an inferior safety profile within the hyperthermia arms. Conclusion: Due to the heterogeneity of the trials in terms of technique, protocol, reporting of outcomes, control interventions, but also tumour characteristics within the same indication, there is a high degree of uncertainty and the available evidence must be considered as insufficient. Large confirmatory RCTs are required.
机译:目的:综合热疗联合放,化疗对乳腺癌,膀胱癌,宫颈癌和软组织肉瘤患者的疗效。方法:基于先前的两次系统评价,在具有相同搜索词的四个数据库中进行了系统文献检索,以寻找随机临床试验。结果:发现了2项针对乳腺癌的RCT,2项针对膀胱癌的RCT,3项针对子宫颈癌的RCT,1项针对膀胱和子宫颈的RCT和1项针对软组织肉瘤的RCT。总体而言,在1265名患者中,有656名被分配接受热疗结合放疗或化疗的治疗。在评估CR或PR的情况下(9个试验中的6个),热疗显示出统计学上的显着结果。一些试验评估了DFS(3/9)或PFS(2/9):它们均显示了热疗臂的优越性。在提供OS数据的9种出版物中,只有1种在总体生存率上有统计学上的显着提高,因此提出了替代终点不能转化为生存获益,而高热仅导致暂时性影响。在任何试验中均未评估QoL。在整个研究中,安全性数据的报告是一致的,显示出高温治疗组内安全性状况趋于劣势的趋势。结论:由于试验在技术,方案,结果报告,控制干预以及同一指征内的肿瘤特征方面存在异质性,因此存在高度不确定性,因此必须考虑可用证据不足。需要大的确认性RCT。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kirisits A.; Wild C.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号