首页> 外文OA文献 >Sustainable Forest Management Preferences of Interest Groups in Three Regions with Different Levels of Industrial Forestry: An Exploratory Attribute-Based Choice Experiment
【2h】

Sustainable Forest Management Preferences of Interest Groups in Three Regions with Different Levels of Industrial Forestry: An Exploratory Attribute-Based Choice Experiment

机译:不同产业林业水平的三个地区利益群体的可持续森林管理偏好:基于属性的探索性选择实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The challenge of sustainable forest management is to integrate diverse and sometimes conflicting management objectives. In order to achieve this goal, we need a better understanding of the aspects influencing the preferences of diverse groups and how these groups make trade-offs between different attributes of SFM. We compare the SFM preferences of interest groups in regions with different forest use histories based on the reasoning that the condition of the forest reflects the forest use history of the area. The condition of the forest also shapes an individual’s forest values and attitudes. These held values and attitudes are thought to influence SFM preferences. We tested whether the SFM preferences vary amongst the different interest groups within and across regions. We collected data from 252 persons using a choice experiment approach, where participants chose multiple times among different options described by a combination of attributes that are assigned different levels. The novelty of our approach was the use of choice experiments in the assessment of regional preference differences. Given the complexity of interregional comparison and the small sample size, this was an exploratory study based on a purposive rather than random sample. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the aggregation of preferences of all individuals within a region does not reveal all information necessary for forest management planning since opposing viewpoints could cancel each other out and lead to an interpretation that does not reflect possibly polarised views. Although based on a smalludsample size, the preferences of interest groups within a region are generally statistically significantly different from each other; however preferences of interest groups across regions are also significantly different. This illustrates the potential importance of assessing heterogeneity by region and by group.
机译:可持续森林管理的挑战是整合多样化的,有时相互冲突的管理目标。为了实现这一目标,我们需要更好地理解影响不同群体偏好的方面,以及这些群体如何在可持续森林管理的不同属性之间做出取舍。我们基于森林状况反映该地区森林使用历史的理由,比较了具有不同森林使用历史的区域中利益群体的SFM偏好。森林的状况也影响着个人的森林价值观和态度。这些持有的价值观和态度被认为会影响可持续森林管理的偏好。我们测试了SFM偏好在区域内和区域之间的不同利益群体之间是否有所不同。我们使用选择实验方法从252个人中收集了数据,参与者通过分配了不同级别的属性组合描述了不同选项,从而参与者选择了多次。我们方法的新颖之处在于使用选择实验来评估区域偏好差异。考虑到区域间比较的复杂性和较小的样本量,这是一项基于目的而非随机样本的探索性研究。然而,我们的研究结果表明,一个地区内所有个人的偏好汇总并不能揭示森林经营规划所需的所有信息,因为相反的观点可能会相互抵消,并导致解释无法反映可能的两极分化的观点。尽管基于较小的样本量,但区域内的兴趣组的偏好通常在统计学上彼此显着不同;但是,跨地区的利益群体的偏好也存在显着差异。这说明了按区域和组评估异质性的潜在重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号